I tested a (host) kernel build without the *_FS_SECURITY thingies, but
with same result. I guess the problem is something else.
// Joel
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Joel Palmius wrote:
>> Confirmed on my athlon64 gentoo setup. I've been running 2.6.14.3 as
>> host kernel for
Confirmed on my athlon64 gentoo setup. I've been running 2.6.14.3 as host
kernel for ages (since I was too wimpy to try to upgrade a host kernel
remote on a machine that required binary proprietary drivers).
On 2.6.14.3 x86_64 all my 32bit UMLs run fine with various guest kernels
compiled in va
master linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r6 # grep -i security .config
CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_JFS_SECURITY=y
CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y
# Security options
# CONFIG_SECURITY is not set
master linux-2.6.18-gentoo-r6 # cd ..
master src # cd linux-2.6.14.3
Joel Palmius wrote:
> Confirmed on my athlon64 gentoo setup. I've been running 2.6.14.3 as
> host kernel for ages (since I was too wimpy to try to upgrade a host
> kernel remote on a machine that required binary proprietary drivers).
>
> On 2.6.14.3 x86_64 all my 32bit UMLs run fine with various
>> On fully up to date Fedora Core 6 x86_64, the kernel does display
>> something before crashing:
>> # uname -a
>> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-1.2869.fc6 #1 SMP Wed Dec 20 14:51:34
>> EST 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> # ./kernel32-2.6.19.2
>> Checking that ptrace can change syste
Antoine Martin wrote:
> Antoine Martin wrote:
> I have downgraded the x86 boxes to 2.6.15.7 and these are up and
> running again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just
> not an option for some of the amd64 boxes.
My setup is:
>>> Thanks for that. That is very simi
