On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Antoine Martin wrote:
> and this one:
> http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/uml/patches/2.6.18-rc4/uml-x11-fb
> which applied cleanly, but is not letting me set the option - Kconfig is
> beyond me:
>
> arch/um/Kconfig:144:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'X11_FB' refer to
> undef
replay
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techs
Dear,
We released VMKNOPPIX(20070328) with Trusted Boot.
http://unit.aist.go.jp/itri/knoppix/vmknoppix/index-en.html
VMKnoppix is a collection of Virtual Machine Software, Xen, KVM,
VirtualBox, QEMU, KQEMU(QEMU with Accelerator) and UserModeLinux.
This version includes "Trusted Boot" (Trusted
Antoine Martin wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:22:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> There are patches floating around for a UML frame buffer device.
>>> Gerd Kraxel^H^H^H^H^H^HHoffmann did one using plain X11, which worked
>>> great when I gave it a try.
>>>
>>> I su
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On lunedì 2 aprile 2007, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Jeff Dike wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the
user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer imple
On lunedì 2 aprile 2007, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Clean up arch/um/kernel/process.c -
> lots of return(x); -> return x; conversions
> a number of the small functions are either unused, in which
> case they are gone, along any declarations in a header, or could be
> made static.
> curre
On lunedì 2 aprile 2007, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:58:45PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> >> I reckon that one critical thing which could drastically increase the
> >> user base would be to have a working virtual framebuffer implementation.
> >
> > Why?
