Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:52:02PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote: > >On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following: > >> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;( > >> > >> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here: >

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread WANG Cong
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 07:42:33AM +0100, Nix wrote: >On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following: >> I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;( >> >> Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here: >> http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt > >It's hard to tell witho

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread Nix
On 22 Oct 2007, WANG Cong uttered the following: > I build UML for non-SMP x86. But I don't know about UML_NET_VDE. ;( > > Errors threw out by gcc (too many) are put here: > http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt It's hard to tell without LOCALE=C, but those are the sorts of results I'd expect

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread WANG Cong
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 06:22:14AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: >On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:37:46PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: >> >Fallout continues; I've got a preliminary patch for it. Basically, we >> >need to stop doing -U__i386__ et.al. >> > >> >> Hi, Al. >> >> I applied your patch and recompiled the

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread Al Viro
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:37:46PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > >Fallout continues; I've got a preliminary patch for it. Basically, we > >need to stop doing -U__i386__ et.al. > > > > Hi, Al. > > I applied your patch and recompiled the kernel. But it failed again. > ;( Details would be welcome...

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread WANG Cong
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 04:43:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: >On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:20:32PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:08:48AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: >> >On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:48:54PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: >> >> UML still doesn't build on 2.6.23-git16. >> >> >>

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread Al Viro
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:20:32PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:08:48AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:48:54PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > >> UML still doesn't build on 2.6.23-git16. > >> > >> Gcc threw out many errors, I put them in the web: > >>ht

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread WANG Cong
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:08:48AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: >On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:48:54PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: >> UML still doesn't build on 2.6.23-git16. >> >> Gcc threw out many errors, I put them in the web: >> http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt > >Looks like either you need to ru

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:48:54PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > UML still doesn't build on 2.6.23-git16. > > Gcc threw out many errors, I put them in the web: > http://wangcong.org/down/errors.txt Looks like either you need to run mrproper and try again, or maybe fallout from the x86 merge, wi

Re: [uml-devel] User Mode Linux still doesn't build in 2.6.23-final.

2007-10-21 Thread WANG Cong
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 12:41:29PM +0100, Nix wrote: >On 20 Oct 2007, Paolo Giarrusso told this: >> Guess most people are not using SMP right now, and that the error disappears >> without that setting > >It doesn't. It fails with non-SMP as well. > UML still doesn't build on 2.6.23-git16. Gcc th