On 8 Dec 2007, Karol Swietlicki outgrape:
> I can't wait to test this.
WORKSFORME, nice and fast again just in time for weeks of unattended
operation as I head out for a nice long Newtonmass break. :)
(so it had better not crash! ;} )
--
`The rest is a tale of post and counter-post.' --- Ian Ra
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:24:57PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>>I see no os_clone(), yet the glibc clone() does the same caching of pid in
>>ThreadLocalStorage [TLS], and the TLS still may be shared. If nobody reads
>>glibc's shared TLS slot for PID then an actual bug will be av
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:24:57PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>In source file arch/um/os-Linux/process.c there is a warning:
>-
>/* Don't use the glibc version, which caches the result in TLS. It misses some
> * syscalls, and also breaks with clone(), which does not unshare the TLS.
> */
>
>int
