Re: [uml-devel] [RFC PATCH] SKAS3 for 2.6.24-rc7 (2nd try)

2008-01-13 Thread Ryan Finnie
Oh, and it appears that with a little glue (attached), the SKAS3 and SKAS4 patches can co-exist. I currently have a host running with both SKAS3 and SKAS4 guests running on it. And if you apply SKAS3, SKAS4 and the glue to a guest, it should be able to run on SKAS3 or SKAS4 hosts (with SKAS4 bein

[uml-devel] [RFC PATCH] SKAS3 for 2.6.24-rc7 (2nd try)

2008-01-13 Thread Ryan Finnie
Ryan Finnie wrote: > sysdep-i386/skas_ptrace.h and sysdep-x86_64/skas_ptrace.h are nearly > identical, so I can't figure out why ptrace_faultinfo and ptrace_ldt are > being defined in the first place. Looks like they were added to include/asm-um/ptrace-x86_64.h to solve a disparity in x86_64 that

[uml-devel] [RFC PATCH] SKAS3 for 2.6.24-rc7

2008-01-13 Thread Ryan Finnie
Please find attached a SKAS3 patch against Linux 2.6.24-rc7, based on Jeff Dike's 2007-12-08 patch for 2.6.23. Quoteth Jeff: > 2.6.24 is going to be even more interesting, given the x86 merge. Indeed it is. This patch is not perfect and I need some help. Host i386 and x86_64 build with CONFIG_P