On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:22:01PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:32:43AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> > Note that the crash happened with gcc 4.1.2 and it will get the
> > -fno-unit-at-a-time flag with the proposed patch.
> >
> > That said, this option or the lack of it ough
On Jun. 30, 2008, 19:22 +0300, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:32:43AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Note that the crash happened with gcc 4.1.2 and it will get the
>> -fno-unit-at-a-time flag with the proposed patch.
>>
>> That said, this option or the lack of it
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:32:43AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
> Note that the crash happened with gcc 4.1.2 and it will get the
> -fno-unit-at-a-time flag with the proposed patch.
>
> That said, this option or the lack of it ought not to cause any
> runtime crashes. If it does, I'd feel much more
