[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> H
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've compiled an UML kernel based on 2.6.25 but loading kernel modules
seems to be broken. No matter
Tomas Mraz wrote:
> errno has garbage value - this should be fixed by initializing errno to
> 0 before the poll/select calls.
Actually after it returns with timeout - a successfull
syscall is free to set errno to whatever value it wants,
it is only after an error the value has to be meaningful
(I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've compiled an UML kernel based on 2.6.25 but loading kernel modules
> seems to be broken. No matter whic
On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:08 +0200, Stanislav Meduna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I and a few other users are seeing sshd failing with
>Couldn't obtain random bytes (error 604389476)
> and other ssl-related application failing randomly
> in user mode linux guests and I suspect a problem
> in openssl that g
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I've compiled an UML kernel based on 2.6.25 but loading kernel modules
seems to be broken. No matter which module I try to load the output
looks similar to this:
overflow in rel
Hi,
I and a few other users are seeing sshd failing with
Couldn't obtain random bytes (error 604389476)
and other ssl-related application failing randomly
in user mode linux guests and I suspect a problem
in openssl that got triggered by some change in UML.
I reviewed the RAND_poll function in
Brock, Anthony - NET wrote:
>> Now he has replaced random with urandom in my chroot jail,
>> so the UML's random is his urandom. Let's see what happens...
>
> Please keep me appraised of what you find.
Look like this works - at least there were no problems over the night.
>
Jeff Dike wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:37:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm glad to here that the bug has been fixed. Anyway, it does not work
with my configuration:
- CentOS 5.1 as host system and UML root fs
- Kernel 2.6.25.4 (vanilla, but config taken from the CentOS kernel
