> On Monday 30 June 2008 11:22:01 Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Uli reported a crash on x86_64 with gcc 4.1.2 with unit-at-a-time
>
> ...
>
> > If that crash does come back, I'd say we should just debug it. It's
> > likely UML implicitly relying on some gcc behavior anyway.
>
> Well, I'm seeing the cra
On Monday 30 June 2008 11:22:01 Jeff Dike wrote:
> Uli reported a crash on x86_64 with gcc 4.1.2 with unit-at-a-time
...
> If that crash does come back, I'd say we should just debug it. It's
> likely UML implicitly relying on some gcc behavior anyway.
Well, I'm seeing the crash in stock 2.6
Recently I get my emails to user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
rejected.
I'm trying to see if going through a different SMTP server will help.
Sorry for the noise
Boaz
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin
Stanislav Meduna wrote:
> Am I seeing ghosts? Anyone got other mysterious
> problems with current UML kernel? Could it be that
> some state-saving method is corrupting fp registers
> or something like that? Was there some change in the
> UML / vanilla kernel recently?
Confirmed: I can reproduce o
Hi,
Well, I am now puzzled quite a bit more. Another problem
on this UML box is that if I do tail -f on some file,
I ocassionally get an assertion:
tail: xnanosleep.c:67: xnanosleep: Assertion `0 <= seconds' failed.
This seems to happen more often (or at all) when I am
doing something using the
Boaz Harrosh schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
except for the 2.6.26 which still exits with a panic on startup...
BTW: v2.6.26 checkout from Linus git crashes for me too
2.6.27-rc1 is fine (except it has another problem which I'm bisecting now)
here is the BUG_ON trace:
Stub registe
