On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>Américo Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> Américo Wang wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a
>
> Do
Apparently, nobody other than me has ever attempted to use User Mode Linux
built from 2.6.28 on x86-64, because it doesn't work. It still doesn't work
in current git. I complained about it not working back in January:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200901130159.04389.
Américo Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> Américo Wang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a
Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um
give's me:
L
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>Américo Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a
>>>
>>> Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um
>>> give's me:
>>>
>>> LD vmlinux.o
>>> MODPOST vmlinux
Américo Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a
>>
>> Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um
>> give's me:
>>
>> LD vmlinux.o
>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>> WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a
>
>Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um
>give's me:
>
>LD vmlinux.o
>MODPOST vmlinux.o
>WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
>
>
>Sorry if this is a dup
On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a
Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um
give's me:
LD vmlinux.o
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux
Sorry if this is a duplicate report
Boaz
---
On Thu 05-03-09 21:18:54, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:05:16 Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara
On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:05:16 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > first, I'd like to point out that th
On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > first, I'd like to point out that this has happened under UML so it
> > > > can be just some obsc
10 matches
Mail list logo