Dear Cong,
Thank you for the detailed analysis of the code.
I'll change the code taking care of your observations asap.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:15:08PM +0800, Am??rico Wang wrote:
> >I have updated the patch, now it should be (more) consistent
> >with the Coding Style specifications.
> You can
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:41:38PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>> Please check Documentation/CodingStyle. Every second line above
>> violates it. scripts/checkpatch.pl can help out with the more
>> obvious ones.
>Ingo,
>
>Thank you for your comment.
>You are right, I beg your pardon.
>I have upda
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:41:03PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>I am re-submitting the two patches. Now they should be (more)
>consistent with the Coding Style specifications.
>
>This patch adds the new PTRACE_VM_SKIPCALL and PTRACE_VM_SKIPEXIT
>tags for ptrace's addr parameter.
>In this way it is p
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:44:36PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote:
>Cong,
>
>I have updated the PTRACE_VM patches.
>The patches have been rebased to linux-2.6.29-rc7 but apply to
>linux-2.6.29-rc7-git3.
>
>The set is composed by two patches.
>The first one is for all those architectures where PTRACE_SY
