I'm looking at doing some work on DRM modules in the latest (2.6.30-rcX)
kernel. I would like to UML to assist in debugging. I've gotten UML to
compile, and "boot" the linux-2.6.30-rc8 kernel. I can log in, and run
commands, etc. It does however appear to be a bit unstable, So here's
my questio
On 06/22/2009 01:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Amerigo,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800 Amerigo Wang
> wrote:
>> Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> I would be happy to do this, all I need is for someone to tell me how to
Hi Amerigo,
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800 Amerigo Wang
wrote:
>
> Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree?
>
> Thanks!
I would be happy to do this, all I need is for someone to tell me how to
do this given we have PowerPC hosts so our X86 compilers are
On 06/20/2009 03:55 AM, Paul Menage wrote:
> UML: Fix some apparent bitrot
>
> - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops
> - dma_sync_single() changes
> - cpumask_clear() -> cpumask_clear_cpu()
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage
>
> --
>
> Fixes the following compile errors:
>
> inclu
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:43:52AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>Stephan hi.
>
>The above breakage is the usual stuff we get every merge window. With people
>doing
>cross arch work and neglecting UML.
>
>Who is the person or people responsible for the large linux-next compilation
>rig?
>Is it pos
