On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:14:43PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The i386 subarch happens to pull in original NR_syscalls. Maybe we can
>>> make that work for all host arch, but for now just avoid the clash by
>>> us
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:09:15PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Jeff Dike wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:09:49PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare the struct.
>>> Did you meet any b
Running gdbserver in a UML instance displays "Couldn't
write debug register" after setting a breakpoint and continuing after
attaching from a remote gdb on the host. This is on an AMD x86_64
machine. The error message was resulting from getting EIO error when
making a PTRACE_POKEUSER call. I debug
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare the struct.
> >>>
> >> Did you meet any build error? If yes, please include it.
> >
> > What does this patch fix, aside from being a bit cleaner?
>
> CC arch/um/sys-i386/elfcore.o
> In file includ
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > Shouldn't this signal.c #include ?
> >
> > Well, it gets included implicitly through uaccess.h -> sched.h ->
> > kernel.h.
>
> You're depending on the internal details of uaccess.h and sched.h. If
> either of them changed, then this would cause unexp
Amerigo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> The i386 subarch happens to pull in original NR_syscalls. Maybe we can
>> make that work for all host arch, but for now just avoid the clash by
>> using an all-upper-case name.
>>
>
> Where?
Not sure if this answ
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> Well, if Jeff isn't actively maintaining UML any more, either you can take
>> over the maintainership yourself, or feed the non-trivial patches through
>> Andrew Morton.
>
> Yes, these generally go through Andrew.
Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:09:49PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare the struct.
>>>
>> Did you meet any build error? If yes, please include it.
>
> What does this patch f
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:35:52PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> > Shouldn't this signal.c #include ?
>
> Well, it gets included implicitly through uaccess.h -> sched.h ->
> kernel.h.
You're depending on the internal details of uaccess.h and sched.h. If
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > >Already defined in kernel.h. The official version assumes that 'n' is
> > >power of two - which it is in our case.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> > >---
> > > arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c |2 --
> > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletio
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Well, if Jeff isn't actively maintaining UML any more, either you can take
> over the maintainership yourself, or feed the non-trivial patches through
> Andrew Morton.
Yes, these generally go through Andrew.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:33:58PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >Already defined in kernel.h. The official version assumes that 'n' is
> >power of two - which it is in our case.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> >---
> > arch/um/sys-x8
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 06:09:49PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare the struct.
> >
>
> Did you meet any build error? If yes, please include it.
What does this patch fix, aside from being a
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >Already defined in kernel.h. The official version assumes that 'n' is
> >power of two - which it is in our case.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> >---
> > arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c |2
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Remove duplicates and unused prototypes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Applied, thanks.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the n
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
> arch/um/drivers/line.c |1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
> index 7a656bd..7f7338c 100644
> --- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c
> +++ b/
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:08PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Remove duplicates and unused prototypes.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Acked-by: WANG Cong
>---
> arch/um/include/asm/system.h |3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/system.h
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:06PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>We can't pull in linux/sched.h, so just declare the struct.
>
Did you meet any build error? If yes, please include it.
Thanks.
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>---
> arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h |2 ++
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>The i386 subarch happens to pull in original NR_syscalls. Maybe we can
>make that work for all host arch, but for now just avoid the clash by
>using an all-upper-case name.
>
Where?
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>---
> arch/um/kernel/ska
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Already defined in kernel.h. The official version assumes that 'n' is
>power of two - which it is in our case.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>---
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c |2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:53:04PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Acked-by: WANG Cong
>---
> arch/um/drivers/line.c |1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c
>index 7a656bd..7f7338c 100644
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
