Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/5] uml: Fix warning due to missing task_struct declaration

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote: > >> BTW, I don't think compile warning fixes are trivial enough to go > >> to triv...@kernel.org. > > > >Why? > > > Usually compile warnings fixes go into -mm, some coding style fixes > too. Well, I personally don't care that much, submit your patches whe

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/5] uml: Fix warning due to missing task_struct declaration

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:38:53AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: >On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote: >> >> BTW, I don't think compile warning fixes are trivial enough to go >> to triv...@kernel.org. > >Why? > Usually compile warnings fixes go into -mm, some coding style fixes too.

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/5] uml: Fix warning due to missing task_struct declaration

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Amerigo Wang wrote: > > CC arch/um/sys-i386/elfcore.o > >In file included from /data/linux-2.6/include/linux/elf.h:8, > > from /data/linux-2.6/arch/um/sys-i386/elfcore.c:2: > >/data/linux-2.6/arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h:78: warning: ‘struct task_struct’ >