Re: [uml-devel] Ext4 in user mode linux hang

2010-11-18 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
2010/11/18 Ondřej Kunc : > Hi, > > the same test with ext3 runs without problem about a hour, with ext4 it > hangs quickly ... latest hang from all tests was when it filled the > partition (2GB) with data. How long does it take until it hangs? Your test runs fine on my testbed. > Dne 18.11.2010 2

Re: [uml-devel] Ext4 in user mode linux hang

2010-11-18 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
2010/11/18 Ondřej Kunc : > Hi, > > on vanilla kernel (2.6.36 from kernel.org) ... it fails too(so it is not > debian specific), traces from sysrq t (via uml_mconsole) Does it only happen with ext4? > (only processess in D state): > > jbd2/ubdb-8   D 405068b3     0   580      2 0x

Re: [uml-devel] Ext4 in user mode linux hang

2010-11-18 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
2010/11/18 Lukas Czerner : > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Ondřej Kunc wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've recently tested ext4 in user mode linux VM. I compiled linux 2.6.36(from >> debian source package). I configured kernel this way ... only disabled >> modules >> (to work with default debootstraped debian). The

Re: [uml-devel] Ext4 in user mode linux hang

2010-11-18 Thread Lukas Czerner
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Ondřej Kunc wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently tested ext4 in user mode linux VM. I compiled linux 2.6.36(from > debian source package). I configured kernel this way ... only disabled modules > (to work with default debootstraped debian). Then I created this script: > > #!/bin/b

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 2/2] uml: Disable winch irq before freeing handler data.

2010-11-18 Thread Américo Wang
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 05:45:19PM +, Will Newton wrote: >Disable the winch irq early to make sure we don't >take an interrupt part way through the freeing of >the handler data, resulting in a crash on shutdown: > >winch_interrupt : read failed, errno = 9 >fd 13 is losing SIGWINCH support >

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/2] uml: Safely iterate list of winch handlers in line driver.

2010-11-18 Thread Américo Wang
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 05:44:28PM +, Will Newton wrote: >unregister_winch should use list_for_each_safe, as it can >potentially delete from the list. > >Signed-off-by: Will Newton Acked-by: WANG Cong Cc: Andrew Morton Thanks. ---

Re: [uml-devel] "New Challenges in Virtualization" devroom @ FOSDEM 2011

2010-11-18 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Renzo Davoli wrote: > Dear User-Mode Linux developers, > > FOSDEM accepted my proposal for a devroom about > "new challenges in virtualization". > > I think this devroom can be also a meeting point for > user-mode-linux developers to discuss the future > of the pr

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 1/2] uml: Safely iterate list of winch handlers in line driver.

2010-11-18 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Will Newton wrote: > unregister_winch should use list_for_each_safe, as it can > potentially delete from the list. > > Signed-off-by: Will Newton > --- >  arch/um/drivers/line.c |    4 ++-- >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/

[uml-devel] user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike

2010-11-18 Thread Renzo Davoli
Dear User-Mode Linux developers, FOSDEM accepted my proposal for a devroom about "new challenges in virtualization". I think this devroom can be also a meeting point for user-mode-linux developers to discuss the future of the project. I have added an item to the topic list: * user-mode-linux: d

[uml-devel] "New Challenges in Virtualization" devroom @ FOSDEM 2011

2010-11-18 Thread Renzo Davoli
Dear User-Mode Linux developers, FOSDEM accepted my proposal for a devroom about "new challenges in virtualization". I think this devroom can be also a meeting point for user-mode-linux developers to discuss the future of the project. I have added an item to the topic list: * user-mode-linux: d