Re: [uml-devel] user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike

2010-11-21 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Stanislav Meduna wrote: > On 21.11.2010 10:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> * user-mode-linux: dead or alive? > > >From a plain user's view: basically dead > > Why? See e.g. http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/downloads.html > SKAS3 is against 2.6.23 and unm

Re: [uml-devel] "New Challenges in Virtualization" devroom @ FOSDEM 2011

2010-11-21 Thread Renzo Davoli
Pros=+ Cons=- Pros(umview/kmview can be used instead)=++ Richard: - IMHO it's dead as virtualization technology. + But it's still used as playground for kernel developers. + You can easily implement and test new kernel features. Geert: + It's easy to get it running ++ I can run it without needing

Re: [uml-devel] user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike

2010-11-21 Thread Stanislav Meduna
On 21.11.2010 10:35, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> * user-mode-linux: dead or alive? >From a plain user's view: basically dead Why? See e.g. http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/downloads.html SKAS3 is against 2.6.23 and unmaintained (my problem with skas3 corrupting floating point registers di

Re: [uml-devel] user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Jeff Dike

2010-11-21 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:41, Renzo Davoli wrote: > Dear User-Mode Linux developers, > > FOSDEM accepted my proposal for a devroom about > "new challenges in virtualization". > > I think this devroom can be also a meeting point for > user-mode-linux developers to discuss the future > of the proje