On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:33:14 +0200
richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> We have had some problems with the block layer in ~2.6.32 to 2.6.35.
> Commit 4752690 fixed the issues.
>
> Can you please re-test it with 2.6.38?
Same crash with 2.6.38, so it's either very sneaky btrfs bug or
some discrepancy
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> I've decided to use UML when caught some hard to
> debug OOpses on btrfs.
>
> The first attempt to use btrfs on UML gave me stable
> UML crash. I suspect it's a UML's problem.
>
> So I have some questions here (I'm on x86_64,
> 2.6.39-rc2
I've decided to use UML when caught some hard to
debug OOpses on btrfs.
The first attempt to use btrfs on UML gave me stable
UML crash. I suspect it's a UML's problem.
So I have some questions here (I'm on x86_64,
2.6.39-rc2):
1. (major one) BUG_ON trace in UML does not look
as in real kernel
