Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/3] um: Implement a x86_64 vDSO

2011-07-20 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On 07/18/2011 09:07 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Until now UML had no x86_64 vDSO. > So glibc always used the vsyscall page for gettimeday() > and friends. > Calls to gettimeday() returned falsely the host time and > confused some programs. > > This patch adds a vDSO which turns all __vdso_* cal

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/3] um: Implement a x86_64 vDSO

2011-07-20 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Mittwoch 20 Juli 2011, 19:54:02 schrieb Andy Lutomirski: >> On 07/18/2011 09:07 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> > Until now UML had no x86_64 vDSO. >> > So glibc always used the vsyscall page for gettimeday() >> > and friends. >> > C

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/3] um: Implement a x86_64 vDSO

2011-07-20 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Mittwoch 20 Juli 2011, 19:54:02 schrieb Andy Lutomirski: > On 07/18/2011 09:07 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Until now UML had no x86_64 vDSO. > > So glibc always used the vsyscall page for gettimeday() > > and friends. > > Calls to gettimeday() returned falsely the host time and > > confuse