Am 14.08.2012 16:51, schrieb David Howells:
Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote:
Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch?
Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64.
Or ppc or ia64? Or are those defunct?
Those are defunct.
AFAIK viro is working on UML/ppc64.
I can
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common
to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual
arch if possible to reduce redundancy.
The attached patch works.
David
---
diff --git
Am 14.08.2012 16:54, schrieb David Howells:
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.common
to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the actual
arch if possible to reduce redundancy.
The
Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote:
I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense.
warthogls arch/um
defconfig Kconfig.common Kconfig.um Makefile-os-Linux scripts/
drivers/ Kconfig.debug kernel/Makefile-ppc sys-ia64/
include/ Kconfig.net Makefile
Am 14.08.2012 17:06, schrieb David Howells:
Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote:
I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense.
warthogls arch/um
defconfig Kconfig.common Kconfig.um Makefile-os-Linux scripts/
drivers/ Kconfig.debug kernel/Makefile-ppc
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I think arch/x86/um/Kconfig makes more sense.
...
It doesn't exist. Should I create it?
Bah. Helps if I read your message more closely.
David
--
Live Security Virtual
On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells:
How about this then?
David
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644
--- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
@@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config
