On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 09:05:08PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * UML is pretty fast! It's certainly faster (by a factor of > 5) than
> > spinning up a lightweight KVM VM.
> This is interesting. Typically people say you have to
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * UML is pretty fast! It's certainly faster (by a factor of > 5) than
> spinning up a lightweight KVM VM.
This is interesting. Typically people say you have to use KVM or XEN for
good virtualization performance. But for that you need s
I found by experimentation that killing (SIGTERM) the first vmlinux
process only kills part of a UML virtual machine. There are still
vmlinux processes (or threads?) running.
Compare the process listings below before and after sending the
SIGTERM signal to the head process (25356).
Is there a wa
so that the server either crashes (if it is a user mode linux image) or at
least its reboot functionality got broken
- if the NFS server is hammered with scary NFS calls using a fuzzy tool running
at a remote NFS client under a non-privileged user id.
It can re reproduced, if
- the NFS s
