Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-02 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 22:32:11 schrieb Toralf Förster: > On 12/02/2013 10:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013, 20:05:55 schrieb Toralf Förster: > >> On 12/01/2013 11:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >>> I meant xterm for all consoles but con0... > >>> Such tha

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 12/02/2013 10:21 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013, 20:05:55 schrieb Toralf Förster: >> On 12/01/2013 11:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> I meant xterm for all consoles but con0... >>> Such that you can trigger the crash but are still able to see the output. >> >>

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-02 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013, 20:05:55 schrieb Toralf Förster: > On 12/01/2013 11:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > I meant xterm for all consoles but con0... > > Such that you can trigger the crash but are still able to see the output. > > Not sure if the 2 attached files contains useful info,

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with "con=xterm" ?

2013-12-02 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 12/01/2013 09:05 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > Kernel panic - not syncing: do_syscall_stub : PTRACE_SETREGS failed, errno = 3 > > CPU: 0 PID: 1265 Comm: rmdir Tainted: GW3.13.0-rc2-1-gaf91706 > #3 > Stack: > 084bf793 084bf793 46d47bb8 0004 085d0547 6f91 0003 0011