Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] Possible ways to execute

Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco: > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I detailed > before that end with error. > > The full execution, right now, is: > > == >

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] Possible ways to execute

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Balaco Baco wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:18, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco: >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with >> > another option that is there for me. It

Re: [uml-devel] [uml-user] Website is in need of many small changes and updates?

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote: >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with >> > > >> > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I >> > > >> > detailed >> > > >> > before that end with error. >> > > >>

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH v3] um: Switch clocksource to hrtimers

I got the first patchset to build, it works very well on a single core host or with CPU pinning of the UML - the performance gain is > 25%. However, I introduced a race somewhere along the way - it crashes UML reliably if you do not pin CPUs. I will debug it, fix it and submit. I am guessing a