Please, at least mark the info as being OLD OLD OLD.
90% of it is unnecessary.
--
___
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lis
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
> that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
> it would work.
Are you an archeologist? ;-)
Is there a particular reason why you can't use somethin
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried
>> >> > > >> > with
>> >> > > >> > another option
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Richard Weinberger
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>> I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
>> that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
>> it would work.
>
> Are you an arche
