Cool,
Is there a tree I can pull so I can have the next one (the epoll based
IRQ controller) incremental?
A.
On 06/11/15 21:56, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 02.11.2015 um 17:16 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
>> Background: UML is using an obsolete itimer call for
>> all timers and "polls" for kernel s
Hi!
Am 07.11.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Anton Ivanov:
> Cool,
>
> Is there a tree I can pull so I can have the next one (the epoll based IRQ
> controller) incremental?
Sure, it is in uml's next:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git/log/?h=linux-next
Thanks,
//richard
---
