Re: [uml-devel] sysreq t back traces stopped working please help

2014-02-27 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 02/27/2014 09:22 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 27.02.2014 20:05, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: Hi Richard, uml hackers Since some time my echo t /proc/sysrq-trigger stopped producing the proper global back-traces for all Kernel threads. All I get is: I have an idea, do you see

Re: [uml-devel] sysreq t back traces stopped working please help

2014-02-27 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 02/27/2014 09:25 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On 02/27/2014 09:16 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Hi! Am 27.02.2014 20:05, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: Hi Richard, uml hackers Since some time my echo t /proc/sysrq-trigger stopped producing the proper global back-traces for all Kernel threads. All

Re: [uml-devel] does 3.12.2 breaks UML with con=xterm ?

2013-12-02 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 12/01/2013 09:05 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: Kernel panic - not syncing: do_syscall_stub : PTRACE_SETREGS failed, errno = 3 CPU: 0 PID: 1265 Comm: rmdir Tainted: GW3.13.0-rc2-1-gaf91706 #3 Stack: 084bf793 084bf793 46d47bb8 0004 085d0547 6f91 0003 0011

Re: [uml-devel] x86_64 when mem 384M loadable modules do not work

2013-12-01 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 11/28/2013 06:09 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Does the attached patch fix the issue? Yes it is good. I'm very grateful. With this I now am able to fully stress the UML Fedora18 and almost not get stuck at all. (stuckness is usually do to stressed system and allocation failing where

[uml-devel] x86_64 when mem 384M loadable modules do not work

2013-11-28 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Hi um hackers I'm using an x86_64 deployment both host and um-guest. (Fedora 18) When I load with mem=384M all is well but anything bigger will eventually give me problems because loadable modules will no longer load. The bigger mem= is, the earlier it will start. When the Kernel tries to load

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at init/main.c:711 do_one_initcall()

2013-11-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 11/25/2013 04:43 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: snip [It stopped to be very important for me since I stopped using UM very much. Ever since FC17 I'm unable to produce a running image. It just will not boot, an image that a kvm would. So very sad me, but no UML for me anymore.] Sad to

Re: [uml-devel] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at init/main.c:711 do_one_initcall()

2013-11-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 11/25/2013 05:09 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am Montag, 25. November 2013, 17:06:00 schrieb Boaz Harrosh: Sad to hear. Did you try one from http://fs.devloop.org.uk/? Just booted a FC18 on UML. Works fine. I just tried this exact one last week. (It gets stuck half way through boot

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH V5 18/30] fs: add read_iter and write_iter to several file systems

2013-01-10 Thread Boaz Harrosh
...@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk Cc: Jan Kara j...@suse.cz Cc: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org Cc: Andreas Dilger adilger.ker...@dilger.ca Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp Thanks looks good. ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com Cc: Boaz Harrosh

Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

2012-06-07 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/06/2012 05:20 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On 06/04/2012 11:27 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Horray I'm back to my old self. Thanks I'll give it a run and report of any new problems Thanks a million Richard Boaz OK I've run with these for a few days and they are doing the Job

Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

2012-06-07 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/07/2012 10:35 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: Please also CC: Stable Tree sta...@kernel.org for 3.4 as clearly 3.4 is unusable at all right now. I forgot to ask: Please CC: me on these patches I would like to be notified of their advancements into the different trees. Thanks Boaz

Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

2012-06-07 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/07/2012 12:22 PM, Alan Cox wrote: On 06/07/2012 11:45 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: We cannot push this patch to Linus or -stable. The problem is that will break other things. E.g. login on non-tty0 terminals will break if the distro uses util-linux's login. I don't understand.

Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

2012-06-07 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/07/2012 01:19 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: No, it works fine. OK Sorry I missed that part. So you are saying that these patches fix Fedora, but completely break other systems which now work? I saw in your cover letter that Debian was fine with or without -hangup() so I assumed all

Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

2012-06-07 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/07/2012 01:52 PM, Alan Cox wrote: No, it works fine. Not really. You happen to be lucky. Anyway with no tty port the UML code will soon cease to function completely so a solution of some sort is needed. This is what I understood. That mainline code moved so far that the current

Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

2012-06-06 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/04/2012 11:27 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: This patch set moves the UML console driver to the new TTY port interface. It does ref counting and uses the tty_port_*-helpers. Please note, it's not yet UML mconsole safe! Anyway, I see some really strange things and I'm not sure whether

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 13/24] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port

2012-06-04 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/04/2012 06:42 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.06.2012 17:41, schrieb Jiri Slaby: Hmm, I remember. I suggest you to split the patch into several pieces. For example moving the code from -open into -install can be done separately. Otherwise it's hard to tell what's wrong with the

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 13/24] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port

2012-06-04 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/04/2012 07:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.06.2012 18:27, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: On 06/04/2012 06:42 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.06.2012 17:41, schrieb Jiri Slaby: Hmm, I remember. I suggest you to split the patch into several pieces. For example moving the code from

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 13/24] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port

2012-06-04 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/04/2012 07:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.06.2012 18:27, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: On 06/04/2012 06:42 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.06.2012 17:41, schrieb Jiri Slaby: Hmm, I remember. I suggest you to split the patch into several pieces. For example moving the code from

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 13/24] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port

2012-06-04 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/04/2012 08:05 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 04.06.2012 18:55, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: No still crashing the same, way. BTW I do not have a systemd Distro. It's plain old FC12. Though in the lab I have the same crash with FC15. The crash is immediately after I login at the initial

Re: [uml-devel] UML: Please help with __module_text_address crashing

2012-05-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 03/15/2012 12:40 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.03.2012 23:28, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: But surly it needs to go upstream. I'll run with it out of tree for now. As of now it's not ready for upstream. I'll submit it as -stable patch as soon as possible. Richard hi, I've been

Re: [uml-devel] UML: Please help with __module_text_address crashing

2012-05-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 05/25/2012 10:40 AM, Richard RW. Weinberger wrote: - Ursprüngliche Mail - I've been running with your tty patch for a while now, and was able to work. 3.3 Kernel Now based on 3.4 tree the patch no longer merges, too many changes. But am back to the same crashes as before. Do you

[uml-devel] [PATCH ] um: uml_setup_stubs': warning: unused variable 'pages'

2012-03-26 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Fix the following gcc complain arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c: In function 'uml_setup_stubs': arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c:106:16: warning: unused variable 'pages' [-Wunused-variable] Signed-Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com --- arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH ] um: uml_setup_stubs': warning: unused variable 'pages'

2012-03-26 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 03/26/2012 07:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: Fix the following gcc complain arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c: In function 'uml_setup_stubs': arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c:106:16: warning: unused variable 'pages' [-Wunused-variable] I get this on today's linus tree. If a fix is already queued

Re: [uml-devel] UML: Please help with __module_text_address crashing

2012-03-14 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 03/14/2012 01:23 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.03.2012 01:51, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: Yes, you mean git checkout v3.2 Yes it's the same all the way back to 2.6.39 or so I just did that I get the same as above: addr2line -e .build_um/vmlinux 0x600179b8 linux-open-osd/arch/um/drivers

[uml-devel] UML: Please help with __module_text_address crashing

2012-03-13 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Since a while now my UMLs are constantly crashing in __module_text_address which makes no sense because if I do gdb list *(__module_text_address+0xd) I get: 0x6005614e is in __module_text_address (/media/usr0/export/dev/bharrosh/git/pub/linux-open-osd/kernel/module.c:3469). 3464 * module

Re: [uml-devel] UML: Please help with __module_text_address crashing

2012-03-13 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 03/13/2012 04:58 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: What exactly triggers the crash? IOW, how can I reproduce it? It's totally random, but always the same crash. I guess if you don't have it then you don't. The most reliable way for me to get it is a simple halt. I'm not able to ever shut

Re: [uml-devel] UML: Please help with __module_text_address crashing

2012-03-13 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 03/13/2012 05:22 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 14.03.2012 01:15, schrieb Boaz Harrosh: I guess if you don't have it then you don't. The most reliable way for me to get it is a simple halt. I'm not able to ever shut down properly it reliably crashes like: Kernel panic - not syncing

[uml-devel] [RFC]: do_xor_speed Broken on UML do to jiffies

2011-10-10 Thread Boaz Harrosh
I put several safety guards, to never get hangs again. And I think my time based approach is more accurate then previous system. UML guys please investigate the jiffies issue? what is xor.ko not doing right? Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com --- crypto/xor.c | 46

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 8/9] um: fix strrchr problems

2011-08-29 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 08/29/2011 03:25 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Try to build it static... I'm building most of the time static. Using defconfig and CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y it builds fine here (x86_64 and i386) Thanks, //richard With some switches and optimization gcc might turn strrchr into a built-in

[uml-devel] Is there a git tree with all these patches IN

2011-06-16 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Hi umlers There's been a stream of nice patches for uml lately. The kind I had on my TODO for a while and never had the time to do them. Thanks Is there a public tree that has all these patches sent to the mailing list the last couple of month? Is this tree included in linux-next? I work

Re: [uml-devel] Regression with calibrate_xor_blocks, probably UML related

2011-02-11 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 02/11/2011 02:38 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com wrote: On 02/09/2011 09:02 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: I have a new module that uses the async_tx.h lib. On an exact same module code based on 3.6.37 I see the: xor

Re: [uml-devel] Regression with calibrate_xor_blocks, probably UML related

2011-02-10 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 02/09/2011 09:02 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: I have a new module that uses the async_tx.h lib. On an exact same module code based on 3.6.37 I see the: xor: measuring software checksum speed 8regs : 11312.000 MB/sec 8regs_prefetch: 9792.800 MB/sec 32regs

Re: [uml-devel] linux-next: Tree for November 18

2010-12-15 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 12/14/2010 11:59 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:41:26 +0200 Boaz Harrosh wrote: Meanwhile I have setup a cron job for every-night to checkout linux-next and make. As a backup for above, until it is fixed. Anything else I can contribute to this cause? From my small

[uml-devel] [PATCH] um: Proper Fix for f25c80a4: remove duplicate structure field initialization

2010-09-29 Thread Boaz Harrosh
...@diku.dk CC: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org CC: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk Tested-by: Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com --- arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c | 17 +++-- 1 files changed, 3

Re: [uml-devel] {painfully BISECTED} Please revert f25c80a4b2: arch/um/drivers: remove duplicate structure field initialization

2010-09-29 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 09/28/2010 10:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote: And I misread that, assuming that it's just a wrapper around eth_mac_addr(). Only it isn't, because it passes eth_mac_addr() the MAC address's address directly (with

[uml-devel] {painfully BISECTED} Please revert f25c80a4b2: arch/um/drivers: remove duplicate structure field initialization

2010-09-27 Thread Boaz Harrosh
[bharr...@fs2 ~/dev/git/pub/scsi-misc] 1115$ git bisect good f25c80a4b2bf93c99820f470573626557db35202 is the first bad commit commit f25c80a4b2bf93c99820f470573626557db35202 Author: Julia Lawall ju...@diku.dk Date: Tue Jul 20 12:25:17 2010 + arch/um/drivers: remove duplicate structure

Re: [uml-devel] UML development, anyone?

2010-09-12 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 09/12/2010 09:34 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote: - Please send a detailed bug report about that data corruption so someone can reproduce it. I'm not sure what block device you are using but it has a bug. If you have a good version 2.6.27 and a bad version 2.6.28. It should be easy to git

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: Include missing header file in os-linux/mem.c

2010-06-29 Thread Boaz Harrosh
#include init.h On 06/15/2010 04:06 AM, Liu Aleaxander wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com wrote: Yes. I have the same patch. Apparently it's new for Fedora 13. Previous Fedora's are compiling fine. Same here:) I guess something has changed

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] um: Include missing header file in os-linux/mem.c

2010-06-15 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/15/2010 04:06 AM, Liu Aleaxander wrote: The os-linux/mem.c file calls fchmod function, which is declared in sys/stat.h header file, so include it. Yes. I have the same patch. Apparently it's new for Fedora 13. Previous Fedora's are compiling fine. I guess something has changed with the

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

2010-06-14 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/09/2010 09:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/09/2010 01:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Peter, are you happy with this? Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a regression in post-2.6.34. Yes, I'll push it. -hpa Peter hi. Why have we missed

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

2010-06-14 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/14/2010 07:41 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/14/2010 09:08 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On 06/09/2010 09:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: On 06/09/2010 01:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Peter, are you happy with this? Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix

[uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

2010-06-09 Thread Boaz Harrosh
From: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127522065202435w=2 Redirect arch_hweight.h include

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

2010-06-09 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: From: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

2010-06-09 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/09/2010 11:46 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com wrote: On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: From: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery introduced

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

2010-06-09 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: From: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
you. I will wait until Sunday, then send a patch to Andrew Morton, perhaps he can send such a fix to Linus. Given UML maintainers have disappeared, right on a merge window. On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:43:52 +0300 Boaz Harrosh bharr...@panasas.com wrote: On 06/20/2009 03:55 AM, Paul Menage wrote: UML

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-24 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/22/2009 05:46 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes - cpumask_clear() - cpumask_clear_cpu() Signed-off-by: Paul Menage

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-22 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/20/2009 03:55 AM, Paul Menage wrote: UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes - cpumask_clear() - cpumask_clear_cpu() Signed-off-by: Paul Menage men...@google.com -- Fixes the following compile errors:

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-22 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/22/2009 01:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Amerigo, On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800 Amerigo Wang xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree? Thanks! I would be happy to do this, all I need is for someone to

Re: [uml-devel] um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux

2009-03-08 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Américo Wang wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 07:27:31PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: Américo Wang wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: Américo Wang wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a

[uml-devel] um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux

2009-03-05 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a Doing make ARCH=um defconfig make ARCH=um give's me: LD vmlinux.o MODPOST vmlinux.o WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux Sorry if this is a duplicate report Boaz

Re: [uml-devel] um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux

2009-03-05 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Américo Wang wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a Doing make ARCH=um defconfig make ARCH=um give's me: LD vmlinux.o MODPOST vmlinux.o WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux Sorry

Re: [uml-devel] um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux

2009-03-05 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Américo Wang wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: Américo Wang wrote: On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a Doing make ARCH=um defconfig make ARCH=um give's me: LD vmlinux.o MODPOST vmlinux.o

[uml-devel] Test email please ignore

2008-08-07 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Recently I get my emails to user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net rejected. I'm trying to see if going through a different SMTP server will help. Sorry for the noise Boaz - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the

Re: [uml-devel] kernel module support broken on x86-64?

2008-08-06 Thread Boaz Harrosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boaz Harrosh wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boaz Harrosh wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I've compiled an UML kernel based on 2.6.25 but loading kernel modules seems to be broken. No matter which module I try to load the output looks

[uml-devel] KERNEL_STACK_ORDER = 0 in 2.6.22-rc4 make defconfig

2007-06-06 Thread Boaz Harrosh
used to get == 2. What is the recommended value for this CONFIG option? My compiling/host is a RHEL 4 x86_64 (with various kernels). Boaz Harrosh - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE

Re: [uml-devel] KERNEL_STACK_ORDER = 0 in 2.6.22-rc4 make defconfig

2007-06-06 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Boaz Harrosh wrote: if I do make ARCH=um KBUILD_OUTPUT=.build_um defconfig in 2.6.22-rc4 I see that KERNEL_STACK_ORDER == 0. The resulting kernel will not boot my FedoraCore5-AMD64-root_fs. Manually editing to 1 will fix that. (By the way: can I change it inside make xconfig?) In previous

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-23 Thread Boaz Harrosh
. If the module is inside the root_fs file than you will need to point gdb to a copy of the module file on the host. I hope that helps Boaz Harrosh #!/bin/sh # # Print gdb command to load a module's symbols # # Copyright (C) 2006 Panasas, Inc. All rights reserved. # Copyright (C) 2006 Benny Halevy

Re: [uml-devel] buggy UML AMD64?

2007-01-21 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Antoine Martin wrote: Antoine Martin wrote: I have downgraded the x86 boxes to 2.6.15.7 and these are up and running again. But I can't do that for all of them, and this is just not an option for some of the amd64 boxes. My setup is: Thanks for that. That is very similar to mine. I don't

[uml-devel] UML and SCSI

2006-11-01 Thread Boaz Harrosh
I have searched the archives and seen some old posts about SCSI not compiling with UML. Since than I have seen some post on the net of the like http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/12/200. (which does not apply but the Idea is clear and can be done by hand). Now when carefully configured I can compile