Re: [uml-devel] Does UML 2.6.14 work under x86-64?

2005-11-07 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, David Lang wrote: GCC version? 4.0.2, hacked to link against uClibc. does it use the GCC you include for the first compile, or the base compiler on the host OS? I added a gcc --version line to the build script and it's the host OS that builds the kernel so

Re: [uml-devel] Does UML 2.6.14 work under x86-64?

2005-11-07 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Rob Landley wrote: Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Does UML 2.6.14 work under x86-64? On Monday 07 November 2005 13:32, Blaisorblade wrote: On Monday 07 November 2005 00:23, Rob Landley wrote: David Lang is trying to get my firmware build working under x86-64, proper x86-64 or

Re: [uml-devel] Does UML 2.6.14 work under x86-64?

2005-11-07 Thread David Lang
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Blaisorblade wrote: On Monday 07 November 2005 00:23, Rob Landley wrote: David Lang is trying to get my firmware build working under x86-64, proper x86-64 or a 32-bit binary? and when I upgraded him to 2.6.14 (to get around the memory leak in 2.6.13.2), he started