On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:35:55PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/17/2016 12:02 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> >> But let's ask Jeff first.
> >> Jeff, do you have a more recent SCM repo of uml-utilities?
> >
> > No, I don't believe so. Everything I have is out there somewhere.
> >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:53:34AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:01:11PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
...
> > Mattia, do you volunteer? :-)
>
> Sure, sounds good to me.
For the record, I'll follow-up soon. I'm waiting for approval from
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:01:11PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 28.07.2016 16:32, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >> This is now:
> >> https://github.com/malattia/uml-utilities
> >>
> >>> The CVS repo on sourceforge is out of date though, it's miss
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:17:09AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb M
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:07:32AM -0700, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
> ...
> > > I can certainly help with that, since I would like to do t
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:33:33AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
...
> > I can certainly help with that, since I would like to do that work
> > anyway in order to refresh the debian package. If you want to stuff
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:11:03PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
> > (the one with tunctl, uml_mount and fr
Hi,
Does anybody knows if there is any newer version of the tools package
(the one with tunctl, uml_mount and friends)?
I'm maintaining[1] the package in Debian and I was wondering whether the
original code is hosted somewhere.
Thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
[1]: with varying degrees of consistency
--
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:57:20PM +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Today I wrote some patches (for libguestfs) which add an experimental
> > UML backend:
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2013-August/msg5
onestly I
kind of recall there was a reason for RPATH to be defined. Maybe that
reason is no longer valid though...
---
commit ea13ff7608ea92df6ffa41e1124e5d3e6d7984fb
Author: Mattia Dongili
Date: Fri Apr 6 07:18:17 2012 +0900
Remove unnecessary RPATH definition
Signed-off-by: Mat
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:49:50AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 17:38 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > For user-mode Linux the other packages are not required. So
> > only build the package with the linux-image in it.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Marek
> > Cc: maximilian attems
> > Cc
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 11:59:42PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> UML_LIB_PATH is hardcoded to /usr/lib/uml/,
> on 64bit systems UML_LIB_PATH needs to be /usr/lib64/uml/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
> ---
> arch/um/drivers/xterm.c |2 +-
> arch/um/include/shared/os.h |7
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:27:31PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger
> wrote:
> > Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone?
> > Please apply this patch.
> >
> > CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :(
>
> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enab
Hello again Jeff,
one more bug report on 2.6.26.2. It looks like .25 is affected as well
are both suffering from it.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:05:09AM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
> Package: user-mode-linux
> Version: 2.6.24-1um-1
> Severity: normal
>
> I use Debian lenny guest environment in UML
;bug=494995
In short statically linking the uml kernel fails with the error below.
Any idea what may be wrong?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:36:19PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 09:36:49AM +0100, Graham Cobb wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:19:05 Mattia Dong
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:54:26PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:44:20AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:20:22AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > > it's not entirely clear to me why, but that patch fixes a segfault that
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:44:20AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:20:22AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > it's not entirely clear to me why, but that patch fixes a segfault that
> > I experience when booting uml 2.6.25 built with gcc-4.3 on a 2.6.25
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:53:42PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:55:09PM +0800, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
> > The patch below solves the 2.6.25 uml crash problem for me. Looks like the
> > problem should be away in 2.6.26 kernel because down_interruptible has
> > changed to the C
Hi,
first of all: do you really mean 2.6.8??
On Tue, January 9, 2007 10:55 am, pierrelaroche said:
> These programs, as found in the Debian unstable tree, don't install
> properly
> on my Debian system. Apt-get insists on first removing all my kernel
> images
> claiming a conflict.
hmmm, maybe a
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:51:43PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:47:27PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:14:32PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > To make some writable tmpfs available to those in need of such system,
On Thu, September 28, 2006 10:19 pm, Petter Reinholdtsen said:
> [Mattia Dongili]
>> Well, I'd actually prefer if you could remove the noexec flag from
>> /dev/shm. I understand the security reasons given in the bugreport
>> but I'd prefer avoid having to deal with
Thanks Petter for writing,
I was going to followup to the sysvinit bug :)
I'm Cc-ing upstream too.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 08:14:32PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am one of the sysvinit maintainers. Recently we changed the mount
> options of /dev/shm/, and got a bug report a
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:19:17PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 24 September 2006 13:46, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hello Paolo,
> >
> > with the following change the patch applies and hopefully works, still
> > building here but mm/fremap.o is done so I&#x
Hello Paolo,
with the following change the patch applies and hopefully works, still
building here but mm/fremap.o is done so I'm quite optimistic :) (__prot
is used in the code, not prot).
NOTE: I hope sourceforge smtp won't reject my message...
--- ./skas-2.6.18-rc4-v9-pre9-fremap.patch.orig 20
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:23:19PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:55:09PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Does this mean that UML will run on a non-standard-vm-split _only_ if
> > the host has CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G=y ?
>
> The question is not clear. The
On Mon, May 15, 2006 5:44 am, Jeff Dike said:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:08:06PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>> > kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
>> > EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
>> > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) re
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:39:54AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:08:58PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Oh, I found
> > CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET=0xB000
> >
> > may this be the problem? I found reports telling it broke other SW:
> > http://li
Hello UML developers,
I received the following bugreport for 2.6.16 UML running on a 2.6.16
host (both are debian packages). I found a similar report on a french
site[1], it seems to be the same problem.
Can you help putting some light there?
Thanks in advance
[1]:
http://forum.hardware.fr/hard
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 04:12:08PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 02:49:37PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
[...]
> > en_GB.UTF-8...BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
> >
> > EIP: 0073:[<40058d3f>] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:af86bd78 EFLAGS:
> > 00200246
> > Not
Hello Jeff, Paolo,
Sorry for the long mail, I hope it's not too boring ;)
I re-packaged (together with Stefano Melchior and Andreas Schuldei) the
user-mode-linux kernel[1] and uml-utilities[2] and I'd like to help with
the issues listed on u-m-l.sf.net pages related to Debian.
Firts of all: are a
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:52:10AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
[...]
> Debian did it the hard way IIRC (don't remember if only for the default
> location of uml_switch socket or also for this), and problems resulted for
currently we ship unmodified uml_socket and modified uml_net paths :)
oh, and
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 08:07:09PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hear you say "who cares?" :)
> Well, such failure uncovers a small bug on 64bit arches with __u64 not
> defined as unsigned long long (oh, that "who cares" again :)).
>
>
Hello,
I hear you say "who cares?" :)
Well, such failure uncovers a small bug on 64bit arches with __u64 not
defined as unsigned long long (oh, that "who cares" again :)).
cow.c: At top level:
cow.c:271: error: conflicting types for 'read_cow_header'
cow.h:25: error: previous declaration of 'read
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 08:45:38AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 April 2006 23:11, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:39:44AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
[...]
> > > #define UML_LIB_PATH ":/usr/lib/uml"
>
> > what about a confi
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:39:44AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Sunday 02 April 2006 21:54, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the patch, we'll possibly apply it, but we need to reimplement (or
> copy and fix from glibc) a two-phase execvp(). I've not done it b
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > --- a/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c 2006-04-02 16:32:38.340801686 +0200
> > +++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c 2006-04-02 16:34:13.454745936 +0200
> > @@
1
The attached patch implements it and keeps backward compatibility.
It's kind of brutal because putenv will wipe any user-defined PATH, if
this is a problem I can provide an improved patch that appends
/usr/lib/uml to the existing PATH. Is this the way to go?
Signed-off-by: Mattia Dongili <[EM
37 matches
Mail list logo
