Hi Michael,
I'm CC'ing uml-devel as the discussion is very relevant and could be
interesting for everybody.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 23:13, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>> "Paolo" == Paolo Giarrusso writes:
> Any idea where to send patches/git-tree pu
pe
Uh, that looks like a missing include (so that for a type, there is
just a forward declaration). Probably now something.h does not include
any more something_else_that_you_need.h.
--
Paolo Giarrusso - Ph.D. Student
http://www.informatik.u
[<08068e8d>] ubd_intr+0x2d/0xf0
> 08300c14: [<080a6b32>] handle_IRQ_event+0x32/0xc0
> 08300c34: [<080a6c1b>] __do_IRQ+0x5b/0xb0
> 08300c50: [<0805b364>] do_IRQ+0x24/0x40
> 08300c5c: [<0805b59b>] sigio_handler+0x5b/0x80
> 08300c70: [<0806eec5>
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 16:18, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Paolo Giarrusso
> Date: Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:34:38PM +0200
>
> Hi,
>
>> > That looks better to me, although I'm still wondering why UML can't
>> > stomach the register-saving tricks... it
kernel. Say, on x86 32bit regparm doesn't
work (in fact, -mregparm is set in arch/x86/Makefile and not in
arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu). And since popcnt is supported on 32bit, it
might in theory make a difference for that case. But maybe those flags
are simply fine, I didn't recheck the possibl
t; User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
>
--
Paolo Giarrusso
--
___
User-mode-linux-devel ma
ally wonder about the
TLS setup stuff - we need to allow the guest userspace programs to do
basically any [gs]et_thread_area() calls. But it's really untrivial
IMHO.
--
Paolo Giarrusso
--
__
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 16:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 19:43, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Lukas Czerner wrote:
>> Right, there was more broken. Besides the locking fix, this should do
&g
-832,7 +834,7 @@ static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty)
> break;
> }
> }
> - spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&winch_handler_lock);
> }
>
> static void winch_cleanup(void)
> @@ -840,14 +842,14 @
patch, just in case anybody else had
> this problem:
>
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3/arch/um/kernel/smp.c 2007-08-12 23:25:24.0
> -0500 +++ linux-2.6.23-new/arch/um/kernel/smp.c 2007-08-21
> 21:39:00.0 -0500 @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>
> #include "linux/percpu.h"
&
s function is not
supposed to change and to need to be kept in sync, it could be copied. I
conceptually hate this solution, but it can make some sense.
--
"Doh!" (cit.), I've made another mistake!
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On lunedì 24 settembre 2007, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:57:49PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> > Yes, indeed - or sign extension on 64bit machines would set to 1 the
> > whole high-word.
> >
> > But using long for that mask makes no difference; eith
d be used, given that the used signal range
is the same on 32 and 64bit machines, it should be u32 for normal signals or
u64 if RT-signals are also allowed.
--
"Doh!" (cit.), I've made another mistake!
Paolo
s really needed I can do them, but it would take
> me some time (and maybe now it isn't a good idea because of they won't
> provide additional useful information :)
No, I just needed a proof that the problem was indeed with the output on a
pts.
Thank you for you help
--
"Doh!&qu
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:38:36PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade'
> Giarrusso wrote:
> > Again, move inclusion of arch's Makefile after CFLAGS setting - I
> remember
> > merging the same patch eons ago in 2.6, so I added a comment.
> >
> > I discovered th
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 07:10:37PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > NACK on the ubd driver part. It adds a bugs and does fix the one
> you found in
> > the right point. ACK on the other hunk.
I'm answering away from the code (limited Internet access) so
Look there, it would be very useful IMHO for UML:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/24/212
But I will not have the time for the UML changes, so tune in for them.
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
---
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 12:56:36PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Can anybody explain me how can we use REGPARM if we have to link
> with host
> > glibc?
> Umm, yeah, good point. This regparam behavior is different from
> the old
> behavior, where re
so it's
time to catch remaining bugs by review.
> So.. I'll await version 5, sorry. Please persist.
I'll try. I just hope we'll not have it next summer (I know it's my
problem, I'm not complaining on you).
Thanks!
Bye
--
Paolo Giarrusso
Chiacchiera con i tuo
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:59:05PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> > I could be wrong, but I trust that thanks to deep and good work
> by
> > who designed locking in the network layer, this patch is correct.
> And
> &g
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > We have never used this flag and recently one user experienced a
> complaining
> > warning about this (there was a symbo
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:47:03PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade'
> Giarrusso wrote:
> > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This spinlock can be taken on interrupt too, so
> spin_lock_irq[save] must be used.
> >
> > However,
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:47:00PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade'
> Giarrusso wrote:
> > +_extra_flags_ = -fno-builtin -m64 -mcmodel=kernel
> What exactly does this do
go to "man gcc" and search mcmodel for the answer to this one.
And x86_64 uses it too,
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 01:08:51PM -0700, Stephens, Allan wrote:
> > Where I think my confusion is arising is in the details of how
> the
> > filtering
> > controlled by the promiscuous setting is actually done. If a
> packet
> > with
> > the "wrong"
"Stephens, Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo:
>
> OK, let me take one more try at explaining what I've observed.
> (And my
> apologies for making this whole issue more confusing than necessary
> ...
> I'm pretty inexperienced when it comes to detailing with the
> details of
> ne
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Why not:
>
> config MAGIC_SYSRQ
> bool
> prompt "Magic SysRq key"
> depends on !UML || MCONSOLE
> default y if UML
>
> -hpa
Because it has always been elsewhere in Kconfig (near MCONSOLE) for a
meaningful reason (
Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On 28.06.2006 [12:13:21 +0200], Blaisorblade wrote:
> Just for clarity's sake, the reason the #undef is there, as far as
> I can
> tell, is otherwise the preprocessor (I'm assuming) goes and makes
> the
> output specification as 1:x86_64 inst
"Carl Radford (DC0854-IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Any chance I can interest the UML developers
I've included some more address (including Jeff, UML 1st author and
maintainer).
> in fixing UML to
> support openMosix (for the purposes of debugging) ?
> I applied the openMosix patch to
Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:57:18AM -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote:
> > I just wanted to report that this went away when trying
> 2.6.17-rc6 as a
> > host. It also works fine as a guest (after I patch it with
> >
>
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/w
--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > moan moan
>
> Can you try the x86-64-clobbers-rcx patch below?
>
> If you don't have it already, apply the fix-x86-stubs patch first.
>
> Paolo, could you eyeball this one for me?
s a complete solution.
> Can somebody else on the list help me to identify the patch for
> this "problem with /tmp filling irreversibly and being unable to
> unmount /tmp" bugfix? Thanks!
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-l
it.
Now, I *do* want to wait before posting to LKML... I'll maybe complain
louder. I'll post to LKML as a last resort, if they show not enough care of
the problem, to urge them to fix it.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.o
me out what is the problem. Same UML binary is
> working fine on my other system.
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Adil Mujeeb
Config info about the host/guest, please, to help...
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.use
the kernel) at least on
2.6.9 prereleases.
> 23838 host-skas3-2.6.9-rc4-v6.patch
> 25510 host-skas3-2.6.9-v7.patch
> but they all behave the same way.
--
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
--
34 matches
Mail list logo
