Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-16 08:27 PST ---
> The kernel menuconfig help says: "Normally, this should be set to Y"
Yep, good note; however likely this
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-15 16:11 PST ---
Toralf, are you happy with the resolution of turning TT mode off?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gent
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-15 15:15 PST ---
The report says switching "CONFIG_MODE_TT" off helped.
And currently, there is no known reason for which a
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-11 02:35 PST ---
Bump. Any news on these stability issues?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 05:06 PST ---
>with more than one boot?
oops, with M686 it doesn't work reliable, now it does not boot even if it
started
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 04:13 PST ---
Forgot one question, and sorry, I don't want be be unkind - did you remember to
test the CONFIG_m686 case (t
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 04:11 PST ---
> switching to CONFIG_MODE_TT not tested
I suggested switching if off (just to make it clear).
> M386 gives
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-18 04:00 PST ---
Hi,
has no effect: echo 262144 > /proc/sys/vm/max_map_count
switching to CONFIG_M686=y works ! (even with m
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|sys-
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111575
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:40 PDT ---
> Yes, and -r1 should include -bs5 already... Bye
nice! bye
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.g
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:39 PDT ---
Yes, and -r1 should include -bs5 already... Bye
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userp
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:12 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=63369)
--> (http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=63369&action=view)
use
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 01:11 PDT ---
UML patch 2.6.12-bs5 also worked with usermode-sources-2.6.12
(that includes the gentoo patchset)
-
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 08:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> Ok, a couple of notes:
> 1) You'll probably like to upgrade your SKAS pat
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-12 10:13 PDT ---
Ok, a couple of notes:
1) You'll probably like to upgrade your SKAS patch to V8.2 or V9-pre7, since
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-09 15:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> usermode-sources-2.6.12 is in portage. Please test it (see comment #51) as
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-06 09:22 PDT ---
About that (since I'm the author of comment #51), actually the solution had a
bit of problems, I thin
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-06 02:57 PDT ---
usermode-sources-2.6.12 is in portage. Please test it (see comment #51) as it
should solve the NPTL is
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-06 17:57 PDT ---
Ok, I hope there is still somebody using UML on a NPTL-only system. The
workaround suggested last tim
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-29 17:41 PST ---
Added 2.6.11-bs4 to portage under name usermode-sources-2.6.11 - thanks. I'd
appreciate it if someone could test it and let me know if it works, I'm not a
UML user my
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-28 09:26 PST ---
Think I found it. Would this be the latest version?
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.11-bs4/
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-13 08:50 PST ---
If it's as quiet as the -stable tree and the patches are going upstream then I
might consider just merging it into gentoo-sources instead. Could you please
give me th
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-08 11:01 PST ---
I'm maintaining some external patches for UML, as "fix after release" a bit
like the -stable tree, but for UML only.
What about adding it to portage? I can help if ne
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-19 12:54 PST ---
overhere the gentoo-source.11-r3 as host and gentoo-source.11-r4 as uml works
fine
what about a skas-patched-host-kernel? a use-flag for
gentoo-sources/usermode-sour
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-02 15:27 PST ---
Perhaps some UML users here could test 2.6.11 (gentoo-dev-sources) and see how
they get on.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC l
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-02 07:04 PST ---
I hope that, but I'm not sure... actually, both 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 were not Good
Enough releases.
Well, not that bad (2.6.9 works like a charm on a host < 2.6.9, in mos
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-18 05:05 PST ---
Thanks for the explanation- thats good news. So, when Linux 2.6.11 comes out
and gets marked stable in portage, we will effectively be able to drop
usermode-sources-2
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 13:58 PST ---
Yes, upgrading would partially help. Alternatively, using a non-NPTL glibc is a
workaround (but things get slower); using the latest, ~x86 glibc, built without
the np
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 07:38 PST ---
Could someone please update me with the status of this bug? Are there still
problems?
I notice that the latest version in portage is based on 2.6.8.1. Would
upgradin
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||user-mode-linux-
|
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43616
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||user-mode-linux-
|
To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following:
E-mail address: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Password: 6eXFx70qgT
To change your password, go to:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi
---
The SF.Net email is
35 matches
Mail list logo
