Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/25/2009 06:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, I applied the following patch to yesterday's linux-next and the i386 uml defconfig build succeeded. Stephan Hi, Does this means that there will be a UML build every linux-next now? The last hunk of this patch

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Amerigo Wang
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:23:02PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On 06/22/2009 05:46 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes -

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Amerigo Wang
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:08:58AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: On 06/25/2009 11:06 AM, Paul Menage wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Boaz Harroshbharr...@panasas.com wrote: Paul? we did not receive any feedback from you I split it out into two patches and sent them about an hour ago.

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:49:01PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote: make ARCH=um SUBARCH=ppc? Or something similar... It would need to be make ARCH=um with an x86 cross-compiler. Jeff

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:06:27 -0700 Paul Menage men...@google.com wrote: I split it out into two patches and sent them about an hour ago. (One for mmu_context.h sent to Rusty and one for the other two fixes, sent to Linus) Thanks for that. I see Linus has taken his. -- Cheers,

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:51:55 -0400 Jeff Dike jd...@addtoit.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:49:01PM +0800, Amerigo Wang wrote: make ARCH=um SUBARCH=ppc? Or something similar... It would need to be make ARCH=um with an x86 cross-compiler. On out PowerPC host I am using

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jeff, On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:48:02 -0400 Jeff Dike jd...@addtoit.com wrote: defconfig is good - that's my normal test config. Currently plain make ARCH=um on PowerPC doesn't appear to work. No, it won't. OK, thanks. For reference, the result of our nightly builds (for UML) can be

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-24 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/22/2009 05:46 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes - cpumask_clear() - cpumask_clear_cpu() Signed-off-by: Paul Menage

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-24 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, I applied the following patch to yesterday's linux-next and the i386 uml defconfig build succeeded. The last hunk of this patch (arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h) needs to be notified to Rusty Russell (cc'd) since that only applied after merging his tree. The rest appears to apply ok

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-22 Thread Amerigo Wang
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:43:52AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: Stephan hi. The above breakage is the usual stuff we get every merge window. With people doing cross arch work and neglecting UML. Who is the person or people responsible for the large linux-next compilation rig? Is it possible to

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-22 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/20/2009 03:55 AM, Paul Menage wrote: UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes - cpumask_clear() - cpumask_clear_cpu() Signed-off-by: Paul Menage men...@google.com -- Fixes the following compile errors:

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Amerigo, On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800 Amerigo Wang xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree? Thanks! I would be happy to do this, all I need is for someone to tell me how to do this given we have PowerPC hosts so

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-22 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/22/2009 01:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Amerigo, On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:57:35 +0800 Amerigo Wang xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: Stephan, could you please also do compiling tests for UML in your -next tree? Thanks! I would be happy to do this, all I need is for someone to

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-21 Thread Amerigo Wang
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:55:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes - cpumask_clear() - cpumask_clear_cpu() Signed-off-by: Paul Menage men...@google.com Looks good. Acked-by: WANG Cong

[uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Fix some apparent bitrot

2009-06-19 Thread Paul Menage
UML: Fix some apparent bitrot - migration of net_device methods into net_device_ops - dma_sync_single() changes - cpumask_clear() - cpumask_clear_cpu() Signed-off-by: Paul Menage men...@google.com -- Fixes the following compile errors: include/linux/dma-mapping.h:113: error: redefinition of