Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> Well, if Jeff isn't actively maintaining UML any more, either you can take
>> over the maintainership yourself, or feed the non-trivial patches through
>> Andrew Morton.
>
> Yes, these generally go through Andrew.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Well, if Jeff isn't actively maintaining UML any more, either you can take
> over the maintainership yourself, or feed the non-trivial patches through
> Andrew Morton.
Yes, these generally go through Andrew.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> I suppose this patch will go through um tree?
> >> Good question. Does such a tree exist? I'm sitting on a few more um
> >> cleanups & fixes, and so far I'm working against Linus' tree as I failed
> >> to find anything more recent.
> >
> > If these are
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>>> I suppose this patch will go through um tree?
>> Good question. Does such a tree exist? I'm sitting on a few more um
>> cleanups & fixes, and so far I'm working against Linus' tree as I failed
>> to find anything more recent.
>
> I
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > I suppose this patch will go through um tree?
>
> Good question. Does such a tree exist? I'm sitting on a few more um
> cleanups & fixes, and so far I'm working against Linus' tree as I failed
> to find anything more recent.
If these are simple-enough c
On 04/19/2010 01:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> We now have to to include linux/slab.h explicitly for kmalloc & friends.
> Files that build against host headers already get their prototypes via
> um_malloc.h, linux/slab.h may even be unavailable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
applied to percpu#for-l
On 04/19/2010 04:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Good question. Does such a tree exist? I'm sitting on a few more um
> cleanups & fixes, and so far I'm working against Linus' tree as I failed
> to find anything more recent.
Well, in that case, I'll route this one through percpu.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 04/19/2010 01:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> We now have to to include linux/slab.h explicitly for kmalloc & friends.
>> Files that build against host headers already get their prototypes via
>> um_malloc.h, linux/slab.h may even be unavailable.
>
> Hmmm... my test u
Hello,
On 04/19/2010 01:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> We now have to to include linux/slab.h explicitly for kmalloc & friends.
> Files that build against host headers already get their prototypes via
> um_malloc.h, linux/slab.h may even be unavailable.
Hmmm... my test um build was okay but I don't k
We now have to to include linux/slab.h explicitly for kmalloc & friends.
Files that build against host headers already get their prototypes via
um_malloc.h, linux/slab.h may even be unavailable.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
arch/um/drivers/line.c|1 +
arch/um/os-Linux/helper.c |1 -
10 matches
Mail list logo
