RE: [uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1 ...

2005-01-29 Thread Anthony Brock
Blaisorblade wrote: > On Friday 21 January 2005 13:15, Gerd Knorr wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Anyone looked at 2.6.11-rc1 for the host? Some more ptrace cleanups >> happened there, and one of the changes conflicts with the sysemu code in >> the skas-v7 patch for 2.6.10. To me it's not clear how to solv

Re: [uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1 ...

2005-01-21 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 21 January 2005 13:15, Gerd Knorr wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone looked at 2.6.11-rc1 for the host? Some more ptrace cleanups > happened there, and one of the changes conflicts with the sysemu code in > the skas-v7 patch for 2.6.10. To me it's not clear how to solve that > conflict as I'm no

[uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1 ...

2005-01-21 Thread Gerd Knorr
Hi, Anyone looked at 2.6.11-rc1 for the host? Some more ptrace cleanups happened there, and one of the changes conflicts with the sysemu code in the skas-v7 patch for 2.6.10. To me it's not clear how to solve that conflict as I'm not familier with the sysemu stuff and how these tree trace flag

[uml-devel] 2.6.11-rc1-mm2 works for me.

2005-01-21 Thread Rob Landley
Okay, my build process actually completed (the toolchain build, anyway) under UML is a more or less stock kernel. Whatever the problem I was having in 2.6.9-bb4, it's fixed in the current -mm tree. Rob --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: