On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:22:46PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> >
> > The problem with SMP on skas0
>
> Does that mean that it works more easily on skas3?
Yup. That completely avoids ptrace issues. I think things should
just about work at that
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> The problem with SMP on skas0
Does that mean that it works more easily on skas3?
> I actually had this somewhat working, but the code was a horror show,
> with much nastiness about ignoring the signals that are needed in
> order to prevent a d
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:02:56PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> For a while now (since tt mode was dropped and skas mode became the
> only option?) it looks as though UML has been UP-only on x86-64. And
> even though the configs appear to allow building SMP on x86-32, there
> are things like the pa
For a while now (since tt mode was dropped and skas mode became the
only option?) it looks as though UML has been UP-only on x86-64. And
even though the configs appear to allow building SMP on x86-32, there
are things like the panic() call in kernel/smp.c:idle_thread() which
imply that it won't wo
