Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-24 Thread Nix
On 24 Apr 2008, Jeff Dike uttered the following: > OK, yell if it starts happening again... I tempted fate, and lo, it happens within the hour... (gdb) bt #0 0x08083e3a in getnstimeofday () I will now do what I should have done long since and turn on frame pointers and debugging info so I can g

Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:57:54PM +0100, Nix wrote: > On 16 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated: > > This *is* a change in behaviour: the backtrace is different! Yay! :) > > I upgraded the guest to 2.6.25 a week ago and it stopped happening. > There is hope. (Mind you it's stopped going wrong for

Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-24 Thread Nix
On 16 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated: > This *is* a change in behaviour: the backtrace is different! Yay! :) I upgraded the guest to 2.6.25 a week ago and it stopped happening. There is hope. (Mind you it's stopped going wrong for week-long periods before...) -- `If you are having a "ua lue

Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-16 Thread Nix
On 15 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > OK, trying that. (I'll extend the instrumentation patch to watch for > zero cycle_interval as well, and see what happens. With luck nothing > will happen except that the crashes will stop... except that they > already *have* stopped for me. Annoying.) Hard

Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-15 Thread Ryan Finnie
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Nix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is NTP adjusting the multiplier part of the clock-provided > > cycles-to-ns conversion function. UML pretended to have a ns clock, > > with a multiplier of 1. When NTP adjusted that down in order to slow > > down

Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-15 Thread Nix
On 14 Apr 2008, Jeff Dike spake thusly: > Below is another patch for you to try. I spent most of last week > chasing this one. The symptoms are somewhat similar to yours - > intermittent UML hangs, although not with UML spinning, and it still > pings. Having not quite the same symptoms is intere

Re: [uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-14 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 05:45:39PM +0100, Nix wrote: > The fixed timer patch you posted a few weeks back has indeed fixed my > select()-based timeout woes. > > Unfortunately, both with the old kludgy approach and with the new > remain-versus-max estimator code, I see intermittent tight lockups of

[uml-devel] Lockups with the fixed timer code :/

2008-04-05 Thread Nix
The fixed timer patch you posted a few weeks back has indeed fixed my select()-based timeout woes. Unfortunately, both with the old kludgy approach and with the new remain-versus-max estimator code, I see intermittent tight lockups of the UML kernel-space ptrace thread, with that thread chewing al