On Tuesday 07 December 2004 13:03, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > > uml-general-protection-fault - from the comment, it seems that if
> > > > that were a page fault, it would be fixable, while we always prefer
> > > > to guess it's a GFP and so to die horribly. If this is true, it
> > > > cannot be merged
> > > uml-general-protection-fault - from the comment, it seems that if that
> > > were a page fault, it would be fixable, while we always prefer to guess
> > > it's a GFP and so to die horribly. If this is true, it cannot be merged.
>
> > That triggeres if some application within uml tries to acc
On Thursday 02 December 2004 12:48, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > > In particular, from a general feeling, you should merge:
>
> Yep, I'm waiting for -rc3 as sync point for my next patchset, then go
> over the stuff, update if needed and submit what I think should go in.
> > uml-general-protection-fault -
