On Monday 06 December 2004 21:13, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Saturday 04 December 2004 23:57, Sven Köhler wrote:
> But since the first reports I got were just about trivial issues which were
> easily fixed (I got *real* bug-reports much later), I just thought it was
> ok (and I wasn't able to reprod
On Saturday 04 December 2004 23:57, Sven Köhler wrote:
> > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.9-bb4/
> runs stable now for about 24 hours, longer than any version before ;-)
Any -bb version you mean, I hope.
Including security fixes (which I had left to Bodo and Je
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/patches/guest/uml-2.6.9-bb4/
runs stable now for about 24 hours, longer than any version before ;-)
Most notable patches are:
- uml-hang-on-2.6.9-host
- uml-fix-reboot-skas
well, does this "fix-reboot" mean, that it doesn't reboot anymore?
because it do
