[uml-devel] Re: Some changes in SKAS0

2005-09-13 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Jeff Dike wrote: From our discussion yesterday, ... On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote: So I thought about avoiding the sigreturn at all. Working on this I found out some small points: I kept this patch - there is a bug (typo) in wait_stub_done() but droppe

[uml-devel] Re: Some changes in SKAS0

2005-08-12 Thread Jeff Dike
>From our discussion yesterday, ... On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > So I thought about avoiding the sigreturn at all. Working on > this I found out some small points: I kept this patch > - there is a bug (typo) in wait_stub_done() but dropped these two, plus my

[uml-devel] Re: Some changes in SKAS0

2005-08-05 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Jeff Dike wrote: Thus I added SA_NOMASK to the flags for the handler. This patch causes sleep to hang sometimes for me. A sleep during shutdown reproducably hangs, as does the sleep before a reboot after a fsck found errors. I had to track it down by bisection. I'm somewhat mystified by th

[uml-devel] Re: Some changes in SKAS0

2005-07-31 Thread Jeff Dike
> Thus I added SA_NOMASK to the flags for the handler. This patch causes sleep to hang sometimes for me. A sleep during shutdown reproducably hangs, as does the sleep before a reboot after a fsck found errors. I had to track it down by bisection. I'm somewhat mystified by this. The only situa

[uml-devel] Re: Some changes in SKAS0

2005-07-15 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:36:34PM +0200, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > All three patches are attached. They are tested in i386 and s390, > for me they work fine. I hope, the patches don't break x86_64. > Unfortunately I can't test that. > If there would be a solution for the RCX problem on x86_64, I wou