Re: [uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 13:31, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > Other issues follow, which refer to copied code going out-of-date wrt. my > > local tree (which I have snapshotted some time ago, after I started > > writing this mail). This is the problem with copying code - and you'r

Re: [uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-26 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Blaisorblade wrote: Other issues follow, which refer to copied code going out-of-date wrt. my local tree (which I have snapshotted some time ago, after I started writing this mail). This is the problem with copying code - and you're starting experiencing it! * important changes for TLS support,

Re: [uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-19 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 18 April 2005 12:54, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Friday 08 April 2005 09:12, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > > * ARCH_SIGHDLR_PARAM works like I feared - you'd probably need {} (or do > > {} while (0)) around the ARCH_GET_SIGCONTEXT because you declare a var at > > the beg

Re: [uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-18 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Blaisorblade wrote: On Friday 08 April 2005 09:12, Bodo Stroesser wrote: Blaisorblade wrote: On Wednesday 06 April 2005 15:27, Bodo Stroesser wrote: s390 implementation is *not* included in tarball, this will be posted later, when thing are more stable. Thank you for all your comments! I don't wan'

Re: [uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-17 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 08 April 2005 09:12, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 15:27, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > >>s390 implementation is *not* included in tarball, this will > >>be posted later, when thing are more stable. > > Thank you for all your comments! > > I don't wa

Re: [uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-07 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 15:27, Bodo Stroesser wrote: > Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to > UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files. > These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64. > > s390 implementation is *not* included in tarball, this will

[uml-devel] UML-patches to prepare UML/s390

2005-04-06 Thread Bodo Stroesser
Here are the patches (tarball attached), that I've applied to UML 2.6.11 + incrementals, before adding s390-files. These patches are tested a bit on x86, but not on x86_64. s390 implementation is *not* included in tarball, this will be posted later, when thing are more stable. Please see patches an