On Monday 13 June 2005 09:09, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 10:54 am, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Yes, patch generation was "a bit" problematic, I met a nice bug in
> > combinediff from patchutils... anyhow I'll release (cleanly) -bs7 when I
> > get more time. I also updated the news p
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 10:54 am, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Yes, patch generation was "a bit" problematic, I met a nice bug in
> combinediff from patchutils... anyhow I'll release (cleanly) -bs7 when I
> get more time. I also updated the news page to track this.
Where's the news page?
Rob
---
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 16:38, itamar wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.11.8]# nice -n -20 make linux ARCH=um
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> make[1]: `arch/um/sys-i386/util/mk_sc' is up to date.
> CHK arch/um/include/skas_ptregs.h
> CHK arch/um/include/sysdep-i386/sc.h
> C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.11.8]# nice -n -20 make linux ARCH=um
CHK include/linux/version.h
make[1]: `arch/um/sys-i386/util/mk_sc' is up to date.
CHK arch/um/include/skas_ptregs.h
CHK arch/um/include/sysdep-i386/sc.h
CHK arch/um/include/task.h
CHK arch/um/include/kern_co
