On Thu 05-03-09 21:18:54, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:05:16 Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara
On Thursday 05 March 2009 21:05:16 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > first, I'd like to point out that th
On Thu 05-03-09 13:55:43, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > first, I'd like to point out that this has happened under UML so it
> > > > can be just some obsc
On Thursday 05 March 2009 04:50:31 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > first, I'd like to point out that this has happened under UML so it
> > > can be just some obscure bug in that architecture but I belive it's
> > > wo
On Wed 04-03-09 16:55:35, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-03-09 15:51:09, Jan Kara wrote:
> > first, I'd like to point out that this has happened under UML so it can
> > be just some obscure bug in that architecture but I belive it's worth
> > debugging anyway. Now to the problem:
> > This has happ
