Blaisorblade wrote:
This just happened to other three people (including me) in these days, so I'd
like to know which rootfs's you used, to get a feeling of what could be going
The rootfs is a kind of minimal installation of FC3 (obtained from
others), the new rootfs is also FC3 made by others an
On Thursday 05 May 2005 04:54, Mei,Jia wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> >>When I try gdb-5.3.90 with uml in vanilla-2.6.10 kernel. I found a
> >> problem.
> >>When I set a breakpoint somewhere, and after some step, uml will
> >>always get a SIGTRAP signal and trap into gdb.
> >>Does anyone met the
Blaisorblade wrote:
When I try gdb-5.3.90 with uml in vanilla-2.6.10 kernel. I found a problem.
When I set a breakpoint somewhere, and after some step, uml will
always get a SIGTRAP signal and trap into gdb.
Does anyone met the same problem as me? Any known fix for it?
No, I don't think there is an
On Thursday 28 April 2005 17:54, Mei,Jia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try gdb-5.3.90 with uml in vanilla-2.6.10 kernel. I found a problem.
>
> When I set a breakpoint somewhere, and after some step, uml will
> always get a SIGTRAP signal and trap into gdb.
>
> Does anyone met the same problem as me? Any
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:54:37PM +0800, Mei,Jia wrote:
> When I try gdb-5.3.90 with uml in vanilla-2.6.10 kernel. I found a problem.
>
> When I set a breakpoint somewhere, and after some step, uml will
> always get a SIGTRAP signal and trap into gdb.
You are running UML inside gdb, not gdb insi
Hi,
When I try gdb-5.3.90 with uml in vanilla-2.6.10 kernel. I found a problem.
When I set a breakpoint somewhere, and after some step, uml will
always get a SIGTRAP signal and trap into gdb.
Does anyone met the same problem as me? Any known fix for it?
thanks!
Eric
