> It's really strange, I'll have to ask on LKML. However, a question: does it
> show up also on 2.6.10 or not?
Yes, it started with 2.6.10. Fine in 2.6.9.
-Chris
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limb
On Friday 06 May 2005 05:30, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> > Has the constant "loadavg of 1" bug been resolved, or has the patch been
> > accepted into 2.6.12?
> >
> > Blaisorblade -- it appears to be back. My recent tests with 2.6.11
> > vanilla still exhibit this problem.
>
> It appears as though
> Has the constant "loadavg of 1" bug been resolved, or has the patch been
> accepted
> into 2.6.12?
>
> Blaisorblade -- it appears to be back. My recent tests with 2.6.11 vanilla
> still
> exhibit this problem.
It appears as though uml-fix-update_process_times-call.patch fixes the values in
/p
On Friday 03 December 2004 19:36, David A. Braun wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Except for target kernel patches, it doesn't look like the download area
> has been updated in quite some time and the User Mode Linux Community link
> is broken. What's the status? Is UML so stable that the only work left is
> to
