Re: [uml-devel] Re: SKAS0 test tree against 2.6.12

On Friday 08 July 2005 12:29, antoine wrote: > > Ok, it's there. I've simply adapted the two SKAS0 patches for 2.6.12 > > (backporting a cleanup and fixing some trivial rejects). More info at the > > web page. > > > > Testing is welcome. In particular, any regression in SKAS3 mode should be > > pro

[uml-devel] [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

This construct is refused by GCC 4, so here's the fix. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.git-paolo/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue

[uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:01:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > diff -puN arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue > arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c > --- linux-2.6.git/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c~uml-fix-for-gcc4-lvalue > 2005-07-09 13:01:03.0 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.git-paolo/

[uml-devel] [Bug 49277] Compile of usermode-sources-2.6.x fails

Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49277 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-09 15:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #52) > usermode-sources-2.6.12 is in portage. Please test it (see comment #51) as