On Tuesday 25 January 2005 23:59, Christian Wicke wrote:
> > You don't need extra memory to use tmpfs.
> >
> > Yes, it speeds up. I have load 4-5-10 (P4, 2.8, 2G RAM, scsi raid5,
> > kernel 2.4, skas patch) without it. With tmpfs I've load 0.6-1-2. (in
> > daytime).
>
> I created a new dir /var/loc
> You don't need extra memory to use tmpfs.
>
> Yes, it speeds up. I have load 4-5-10 (P4, 2.8, 2G RAM, scsi raid5,
> kernel 2.4, skas patch) without it. With tmpfs I've load 0.6-1-2. (in
> daytime).
I created a new dir /var/local/afprod2/tmp, mounted tmpfs with
$ mount -t tmpfs -o mode=1777,size=2
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Michael Halcrow wrote:
I am not entirely clear on the function that ``[ 222 ] =
sys_ni_syscall,'' at the end of the table in syscalls.h is supposed to
serve.
This says that syscall number 222 is not implemented, which it isn't on
i386 (not defined).
Syscalls in UML contstitu
> More or less... you don't describe your environment, from the host config I
> guess it's SKAS however... Do you set TMPDIR to a tmpfs or ramfs mount
> point? Without those tricks, any test is pointless.
I use SKAS. But I don't set TMPDIR. Do they speed ip UML? I probably need
extra host memory f
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 23:46, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> >
> > Well, it should be fixed in the -mm tree
Ok, this is a little but important upgrade on top of 2.6.9-bb4. I hope I can
soon release a patch for 2.6.10, but these days I've got to pass some exams
at University. I hope I can work on this nonetheless.
Changes from -bb4 to -bs5:
* restored the MAGIC_SYSRQ config option lost in 2.6.9 vanilla
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:37:57PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Well, it should be fixed in the -mm tree (and probably in 2.6.11-rc2-bk2, I
> guess, though it's not tested).
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:54, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 November 2004 17:09, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> > Ok, please list the new syscalls - I see at least add_key() and
> > request_key() too - are these three the onl
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:39:26PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Thursday 18 November 2004 17:09, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> Ok, please list the new syscalls - I see at least add_key() and
> request_key() too - are these three the only ones? I'll build the
> patch ASAP when getting your answer.
I
Is anyone running UML on Fedora? My current plan is to run Fedora as the
host OS and Fedora as the UML. I did a little searching on Google but I
didn't find much.
Here's how I have my system setup.
1. Fedora Core 3
2. Software RAID 1 and LVM
Here's a short list of things I don't understand.
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 10:41, Anna Sladek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got some UML hosts (kernel 2.6.10 + skas3-v7) running with a few
> UMLs, which all use a guest kernel with this configuration file
> http://www.stearns.org/uml/config-2.6.10-rc2-netfilter2004.
>
> Actually everything seems fine
2005-01-25, k keltezéssel 20:39-kor Christian Wicke ezt írta:
> > More or less... you don't describe your environment, from the host config I
> > guess it's SKAS however... Do you set TMPDIR to a tmpfs or ramfs mount
> > point? Without those tricks, any test is pointless.
> I use SKAS. But I don't
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 16:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, i would like to use Iptables on my UML guest.
> When i use :
> iptables -L
> i have this output:
>
> ip_tables: version magic '2.6.8-1-686 preempt 686 gcc-3.3' should be
> '2.6.9-bb4 gcc-3.3' FATAL: Error inserting ip_tables
> (/lib/m
Hi,
I've got some UML hosts (kernel 2.6.10 + skas3-v7) running with a few
UMLs, which all use a guest kernel with this configuration file
http://www.stearns.org/uml/config-2.6.10-rc2-netfilter2004.
Actually everything seems fine, but each UML shows a wrong load average
value. It's always the
Hi, i would like to use Iptables on my UML
guest.
When i use :
iptables -L
i have this output:
ip_tables: version magic '2.6.8-1-686 preempt 686
gcc-3.3' should be '2.6.9-bb4 gcc-3.3'FATAL: Error inserting ip_tables
(/lib/modules/2.6.8-1-686/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.ko): Invalid
Hi,
I'm using linux kernel 2.6.9 for both the host and the guest. I'm trying
to debug a kernel module I'm writing.
Unfortunately, the procedures that are described on UML web site are not
usable because they refer to structure/field/variable names which are
not valid anymore in 2.6.9.
As far as
16 matches
Mail list logo
