Re: [uml-user] highmem stability?

2006-03-12 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 12 March 2006 20:37, Zoltan NAGY wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask how stable the current highmem support is, as of linux > 2.6.16-rc6. > > The host runs 2.6.15.6 + skas, the guest runs 2.6.16-rc6, and in > menuconfig it states that > highmem support is currently unstable.. > > I'd like to

Re: [uml-user] Multiple UMLs sharing a single tap device

2006-03-12 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 11 March 2006 23:08, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: > Blaisorblade schreef: > > That's possible, but you need to make UML use the daemon transport, and > > run uml_switch beforehand, connecting it to a pre-setup tap0 device. See > > the main page for more info (http://user-mode-linux.sour

Re: [uml-user] Multiple UMLs sharing a single tap device

2006-03-12 Thread Blaisorblade
On Saturday 11 March 2006 23:12, Julius Schwartzenberg wrote: > Jim Carter schreef: > > With many guests on one host, remember that the CPU is shared, and if > > several guests get CPU-intensive at the same time their individual > > performance will drop off. Also UMLs take a lot of memory; be sur

[uml-user] highmem stability?

2006-03-12 Thread Zoltan NAGY
Hi, I'd like to ask how stable the current highmem support is, as of linux 2.6.16-rc6. The host runs 2.6.15.6 + skas, the guest runs 2.6.16-rc6, and in menuconfig it states that highmem support is currently unstable.. I'd like to run several umls with 2-4G ram... comments? :) Thanks in ad