Re: [uml-user] DSL UML within DSL network problems

2007-01-24 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:17, Maren Peasley wrote: > Hello, > > I am attempting to setup several Damn Small Linux (DSL) instances to > run within a DSL host. I am successful in launching and running > instances (guests) of DSL, but I cannot bring an Ethernet interface up > on the guest. > >

Re: [uml-user] Running uml under valgrind

2007-01-24 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 01:04, mohit tewari wrote: > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to run uml under valgrind? I've seen posts from Jeff Dike > dated 2002 stating that it has been done, but when I run the current uml > version (linux-2.6.19-rc5 > & FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs) with valgrind 3.1.1, on

Re: [uml-user] Fw: Booting ubuntu 6.10 from a physical disk

2007-01-24 Thread n schembr
Do I need to build a new initramfs? what changes do I need to make? >From some howto from xen I think I know what to do: cp -a ./lib/modules/* /lib/modules/ depmod 2.6.18.1-bb2 cd /boot/ mkinitramfs -o initrd.img-2.6.18.1-bb2 2.6.18.1-bb2 The initrd.img is now on the host file system. ./vm

Re: [uml-user] DSL UML within DSL network problems

2007-01-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:17:46PM +, Antoine Martin wrote: > You are using a modular kernel but you haven't added the modules to the > filesystem image. The error message is coming from modprobe on the host, not the UML, and it looks like it's complaining about the -o that uml_net (I think)

Re: [uml-user] DSL UML within DSL network problems

2007-01-24 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:17:51AM -0800, Maren Peasley wrote: > * modprobe ethertap unit=0 -o ethertap0 > modprobe: invalid option -- o > modprobe 2.4.21 Can you upgrade modutils on the host? Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ---

Re: [uml-user] DSL UML within DSL network problems

2007-01-24 Thread Antoine Martin
You are using a modular kernel but you haven't added the modules to the filesystem image. Your options: * use a static kernel (like the ones on my site - let me know if these do not work for you) * loop mount the image and add the modules Maren Peasley wrote: > Hello, > > I am attempting to set

[uml-user] DSL UML within DSL network problems

2007-01-24 Thread Maren Peasley
Hello, I am attempting to setup several Damn Small Linux (DSL) instances to run within a DSL host. I am successful in launching and running instances (guests) of DSL, but I cannot bring an Ethernet interface up on the guest. My procedure follows: 1) Download current.iso from one of DSL's mirror

Re: [uml-user] cannot run UML on FC6 kernels (detalied report)

2007-01-24 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi, thanks for that, it should help figure out which release/patch caused the problem. Could you try the same test using plain kernel.org kernels? (2.6.17 and 2.6.18 for a start) That should tell us if it is was a redhat patch that introduced the problem. Antoine JuanJo Ciarlante wrote: > Hi! >

[uml-user] cannot run UML on FC6 kernels (detalied report)

2007-01-24 Thread JuanJo Ciarlante
Hi! Since 2.6.18 FC5 kernels updates and _all_ FC6 kernels, my uml-2.6.17 fails with same problem reported before @this list: stops responding after "VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly." I tracked back and narrowed the kernel versions where the problem started to show: OK: kernel-

[uml-user] uml_mconsole and uml_dir purpose

2007-01-24 Thread ghannemann
Hi all I have start my UML's in the following manner: screen -S -d -m su - linux-2.4.27 mem=<196M> \ uml_dir ubd0s= ubd1s swap_fs umid= eht0=tuntap,tapx,, This all works fine except uml_mconsole appears to misbehave. If I run uml_mconsole from the host logged in as root, i.