Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote:
>> I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of
>> weeks now on and off. I have been trying to set up a connection
>> outside my host linux box. I can get a connection which allows me to
>> s
Christopher Marshall wrote:
> Joel:
>
> I am curious what would happen if you tried one of the simpler setups not
> involving NAT.
>
> Say you have two physical hosts, A, and B, and one UML instance, C, running
> on B. Let A and B be
> connected to the same ethernet and let there be two /24 ne
Hi Joel,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Joel Kreager wrote:
> I have been fighting with the networking setup of uml for a couple of
> weeks now on and off.
I've described the steps made to get a fully uml virtual machine at:
http://www.ime.usp.br/~baroni/docs/uml-en.html
Take a l
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:49:49AM -0700, Ryan Finnie wrote:
Here's the patches I've used on the latest
> release (2.6.18.dfsg.1-12):
Probably anything that we send to -stable should be backported if
necessary.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot co
Blaisorblade,
As you probably know, Debian released etch as stable last week, and
since the 2.6.18 kernel released with it will probably be around for
awhile (they're planning on a 2-year release cycle until lenny), would
you be interested in maintaining a -bs patchset for it? I've been
running i
Joel:
I am curious what would happen if you tried one of the simpler setups not
involving NAT.
Say you have two physical hosts, A, and B, and one UML instance, C, running on
B. Let A and B be
connected to the same ethernet and let there be two /24 nets (10.0.1.0/24 and
10.0.2.0/24) be
involve
