On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:45:09PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:20:41PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> >> Not quite, skas0 is good but not as fast as skas3.
> >> It just means that skas0 is generally good enough.
> > There is no skas3 patch fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> Hi Antoine and all,
>
> Thanks for prompt answer.
>
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:20:41PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Not quite, skas0 is good but not as fast as skas3.
>> It just means that skas0 is generally good enoug
Hi Antoine and all,
Thanks for prompt answer.
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:20:41PM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> Not quite, skas0 is good but not as fast as skas3.
> It just means that skas0 is generally good enough.
There is no skas3 patch for 2.6.21 at Paolo's site, yet.
What should I do now fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pranjal Kumar Dutta wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to debug an application running inside a UML kernel. Now
> to do gdb to the running process in side UML. My application has its own
> shell (CLI) and I need to debug events caused by the CLI.
Can't yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> skas0 has been in the vanilla kernel for some time, but skas3 is not
>> (and apparently not likely to be merged either).
>
> Does that means we do not need t
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Antoine Martin wrote:
> skas0 has been in the vanilla kernel for some time, but skas3 is not
> (and apparently not likely to be merged either).
Does that means we do not need to patch host kernel (2.6.21 and up) with
skas3 patches (or anything related to U
