Re: [uml-user] http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/

2009-01-12 Thread Antoine Martin
No, this is just another vhost, since uml.nagafix.co.uk has been moved, apache uses the first vhost as default. It will be back when I get a chance to look at it. Jerrad Pierce wrote: > UML images. Has someone mistakenly changed your DNS configuration? > The link given on your website (and many o

Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread lanas
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:30:33 -0800 (PST), K D wrote : > I've built uml with 2.6.28 sources and running this on 2.6.11 kernel. > F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0 > Failed to lock '../bulk_fedora/root_fs', err = 11 > Failed to open '../bulk_fedora/root_fs', errno = 11 > ubda: Can't ope

Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread Unknown
Hello, It seems that you are using the root_fs from the clownix.net web site, because of the term "bulk". But why are you not using it with the rest of the clownix stuff, it should simplify your work, and if it does not, send me a mail, I can try to help. Regards Vincent Perrier Le lundi 12 jan

Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread David Moffatt
I don't know if this is the cause but look for a zombie process. I had something were A locked a file then forked B. A was "kill -9"'d but not B. Somehow the lock was still held. The fix was "killall A; killall B".I think what happed was A was a zombie waiting for B to die so it could ge

Re: [uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread K D
Thanks for your reply. I do see some zombies in my setup but I don't think they are related to this. u1234-lnx linux-2.6.28$ ps aux | grep Z USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND user222 9400 0.0 0.0 00 ?Zs 13:46 0:00 [telnet] user222

[uml-user] F_SETLK failed, file already locked by pid 0

2009-01-12 Thread K D
If I kill all tasks in that session I should see that file getting unlocked right? Can we write a small kernel module that finds/unlocks this file? Will that work? Is there any other way to get around this other than rebooting the box or making a copy of root_fs and using that for uml session?