At 05:08 PM 5/1/2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 29 April 2005 11:59, Suresh wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am running uml with smp support.
> I created 4 threads through kernel_thread.
> I want to run the each thread on a different particular processor.
> I have in the thread
why is that??
regards,
Suresh
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here
At 06:52 PM 4/26/2005, Vincent Guffens wrote:
Suresh wrote:
hi,
So in case of uml, if all the interrupts are being handled in the
processor 0, hence
softirq and tasklets are going to be handled in processor 0. If this is
the case,
then don't you think that smp functionality is lost here. K
n the dairy it was given that it is for 2.5 kernel.
Performance may not be an issue to me, so that I can simulate SMP
functionality that
host linux offers.
regards
Suresh
At 03:46 PM 4/26/2005, Vincent Guffens wrote:
hi,
with uml smp support, only processor 0 is processing interrupts. This is
desc
y show me the pointers.
regards
Suresh
Suresh
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start read
some thing X.
Should I need to build the root_fs for the smp linux.
Kindly let me know regarding that.
regards
Suresh
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI.
Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved
not sure why this symbol is not resolved. to_phys is resolved. Both
are defined in a
arch/um/kernel/physmem.c file.
Kindly tell me how to resolve this issue.
The kernel version is 2.4.20 vanilla patched with uml-patch-2.4.20-8.
regards
Suresh
