st), but it may have to wait a few days
(under a crunch from work).
Thanks.
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Saturday 22 April 2006 05:58, Wesley Emeneker wrote:
I'm running a 2.6.16-bb1 guest kernel on an x86_64 Centos 4.2 host (also
with a 2.6.16 kernel) and guest.
The kernel was compiled with gc
I'm running a 2.6.16-bb1 guest kernel on an x86_64 Centos 4.2 host (also
with a 2.6.16 kernel) and guest.
The kernel was compiled with gcc 3.4.4.
The command line used to start the kernel is here:
#linux-2.6.16-x86_64 ubd0=COW0,CentOS_4.2_minimal_UML_bench mem=1400M
eth0=tuntap,tap0,00:11:22:33:
patches.
Aside from that, the patch compiles and gives me a working binary.
Thanks.
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Saturday 01 April 2006 02:45, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 31 March 2006 18:47, Wesley Emeneker wrote:
On Friday 31 March 2006 02:52, Wesley Emeneker wrote:
I just
64-bit kernel, gcc 3.4.4-2, Centos 4.2
Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 31 March 2006 02:52, Wesley Emeneker wrote:
I just downloaded the 2.6.16-bb1 patch and tried to compile against 2.6.16.
I encountered a problem in arch/um/drivers/cow_sys.h,cow.h, and cow_user.c
arch/um/drivers/cow_sys.h
I just downloaded the 2.6.16-bb1 patch and tried to compile against 2.6.16.
I encountered a problem in arch/um/drivers/cow_sys.h,cow.h, and cow_user.c
arch/um/drivers/cow_sys.h: In function `cow_file_size':
arch/um/drivers/cow_sys.h:33: warning: passing arg 2 of `os_file_size'
from incompatible
he structure that should have
the debugregs member is empty.
Have I simply missed a patch somewhere? Is there something I am
forgetting to do? I'm hoping that I am being stupid instead of something
being broken.
Thanks in advance,
Wesley Emeneker
I have been trying to compile UML on a Xeon EM64T test box we have, but
have been unable to get any kernel compiled. I have tried 2.6.10,
2.6.11, 2.6.4 with the x86_64 patch, and 2.4.25 with the x86_64 patch.
Has anybody else had any luck with this? Or does anyone have a .config
file they would
